Central Administrative Tribunal
Binapani Routray vs DEPARTMENT OF POSTS on 2 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK Order Sheet Item no.: 80 O.A./238/2026 (CUTTACK) [ REVISED FAMILY PENSION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 5 Order Dated: 02/11/2026 BINAPANI ROUTRAY Vs DEPARTMENT OF POSTS
For Applicant(s) Advocate : S.K OJHA, S.K.NAYAK
For Respondent(s) Advocate : CHHABILENDU MOHANTA Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that during the pendency of the present O.A. the grievance of the applicant has already been considered by the respondents. In this regard, he filed Memo dated 02.11.2026, which is quoted below:- "That during the pendency of the present Original Application, the Respondents have duly considered the grievance of the Applicant and extended the benefits as has been prayed for. In view of the subsequent development, the Applicant does not wish to pursue the O.A. further and the O.A. may be disposed of as infructuous." The proposition made by the learned counsel for the applicant has agreed upon by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above, the O.A. is disposed of being infructuous.
Pramod Kumar Das Member (A) Kalpeswar Behera ( ps )