Mastan Ansari vs DEPARTMENT OF POSTS on 4 November 2026

O R D E R

By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial) :

Heard Shri Babu Nandan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The instant Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunal, Act, 1985 for the following relief(s) :- “(i) To issue a suitable order or direction to call for record and set-aside impugned order dated 29.07.2026 and 24.09.2026 Annexure no. A-1.

(ii) To issue a suitable order or direction to the respondent no.2 to continue the applicant on the post of ABPM Bhorsar BO and pay TRCA as usual.

(iii) To pass such other and further order as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

(iv) To award cost of the petition in favour of the applicant.”

3. The impugned order dated 24.09.2026 passed in the matter is reproduced as below :- No: A/Staff/ Arrgt/Pt DDU Sub Dn Dated at Pt DDU Nagar, the 24.09.2026

विषय : ऩंडित दीन दयाऱ उऩाध्याय उऩमंिऱ में िाक से सम्बन्धधत अस्थायी व्यिस्था ऩररिततन ककये जाने के सधदर्त में।

सधदर्त : - प्रिर अधीऺक िाराणसी ऩूिी मण्िऱ द्िारा जारी ऩत्र संख्या: बी-2/ऩोस्टमैन / ऩत्राचार /2026 dated the 29.07.2026 |

श्री मस्तान अंसारी, ABPM र्ोड़सर BO ऱे. का. शहाबगंज SO को तत्काऱ प्रर्ाि से िाक वितरण चककया उऩ िाकघर में कायत करने के लऱए सम्बद्ध ककया जाता है। श्री मस्तान अंसारी, श्री अविनाश कुमार लसंह के साथ, विर्ागीय ऩोस्टमैन के ररक्त हुए स्थान ऩर िाक का वितरण, अगऱे आदेश तक करेंगें।

श्री कुरनाऱ BPM र्ोड़सर BO ऱे.का. शहाबगंज SO अऩने कायत के साथ र्ोड़सर BO के िाक का आदान प्रदान का र्ी कायत संयुक्त रूऩ से करेंगें तथा संयुक्त कायत र्त्ता देय होगा।

यह व्यिस्था अस्थायी है और कर्ी र्ी र्ंग ककया जा सकता है।

सहायक िाक अधीऺक ऩंडित दीन दयाऱ उऩाध्याय उऩमंिऱ

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is challenging the transfer/attachment orders dated 24.09.2026 and 29.07.2026, whereby he was transferred from Bhorsar BO, under Sahabganj Account Office, to Chakia SO. He further states that the transfer/attachment order dated 24.09.2026 passed in violation of departmental rule. In the departmental rule there is no provision to transfer GDS employee one place to another place.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the applicant has made a detailed representation dated 03.10.2026 (Annexure-A-3) for redressal of his grievance before the respondents but the same is still pending. He submits that a direction be given to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation dated 03.10.2026 (Annexure–A-3) of the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time bound manner.

6. Learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the prayer of the applicant but he has no objection to decide the representation.

7. However, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this O.A. pending. Accordingly, the OA is disposed of at the admission stage itself with direction to competent authority amongst the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation dated 03.10.2026 (Annexure–A-3) of the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The order so passed shall be communicated to the applicant without any delay. No order as to costs.

8. It is made clear that this Tribunal has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

9. All MAs pending in this O.A. also stand disposed off.

(Justice Rajiv Joshi)

Member(Judicial)

RKM/