Central Administrative Tribunal
SHYAM NARAIN vs SHRI RAJESH KUMAR SINGH AND ORS on 5 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD Order Sheet Item no.: 30 C.P./259/2025 (ALLAHABAD) [ CONTEMPT ] In O.A./333/2016 MACP With M.A./6019/2026 ACCEPTANCE APPL Court No.: 3 No of Adjournment: 10 Order Dated: 05/11/2026 SHYAM NARAIN Vs SHRI RAJESH KUMAR SINGH AND ORS
For Applicant(s) Advocate :
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Order of The Tribunal Mr. Sunil holding brief of Mr. Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr. Raghvendra Pratap along with Ms. Karishma Singh and Mr. Diwakar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents, are present. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have filed a supplementary affidavit on 04.11.2026, which is not available on record. The Registry is directed to trace out the same and place it on record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the respondents are not complying with the judgment and order passed by this Tribunal, which was affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 17.08.2026, only on account of a typographical error regarding the O.A. Number. It is submitted that once the respondents acknowledged the said order, the judgment of this Tribunal ought to have been complied with instead of taking technical objections. Opposite Party No. 2 is directed to file a personal affidavit detailing the steps taken for complying with the order of this Tribunal. List this case on 06.01.2027. Ms Manju Pandey Member (A) Rajnish Kumar Rai Member (J) Arpita Srivastav ( steno 'c' )