SMT VINDHYAVASINI vs NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY on 5 November 2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD Order Sheet Item no.: 41 O.A./645/2025 (ALLAHABAD) [ FAMILY PENSION ] With Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 13 Order Dated: 05/11/2026 SMT VINDHYAVASINI Vs NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY

For Applicant(s) Advocate :

For Respondent(s) Advocate : Order of The Tribunal Shri Suraj Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, and Shri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents, are present and heard. On the complaint of the father of the deceased employee the family pension to the applicant was stopped by the respondents. Although the counter and rejoinder have been exchanged, yet, the applicant has not arrayed the complaint as a respondent. In the counter affidavit, at page no. 58, a report is annexed mentioning therein that the applicant was not found present at the address given in the PPO as well as other documents. The applicant’s stand is that she has not remarried and a certificate to this effect has been issued by the competent authority.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is necessary to hear the stand of the complainant who is also the father of the deceased employee. Learned counsel for the applicant is hereby directed to array the father of the deceased employee namely Ramhit Tiwari as respondent no.4. Office is directed to issue notice to the newly impleaded respondent. List this matter on 15.12.2026. Justice Om Prakash VII Member (J) Madhu Kumari ( steno 'c' )