Central Administrative Tribunal
Ramanand Rawat vs DEFENCE on 6 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Original Application No. 332/00694/2026
This the 06th day of November, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Ojha, Member-J
Ramanand Rawat, aged about 44 years, S/o late Shatrughan @
Shatrohan, Resident of Village and Post-Khaira Kanku, District- Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh
…..Applicant.
By Advocate: Shri Salik Ram Yadav.
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Union of India through Secretary Defence, Civil Secretariat, New Delhi.
2. AGE, E/M (Hospital) C/o Garrison Engineer E/M, 36, Lal Bahadur Shastri Marg, Lucknow.
............ Respondents.
By Advocate: Ms. Prayagmati Gupta.
O R D E R (ORAL)
Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Ojha, Member-J
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the applicant dated 19.06.2026, which is annexed at (Annexure-1) at page-16 of the OA by the respondents by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
3. To this, learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicant’s representation is directed to be decided in the manner suggested, then a period of at least two months may be allowed for the same.
4. In view of the above submissions, the respondents/Competent authority is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the applicant dated 19.06.2026, which is annexed at (Annexure-1) at page-16 of the OA within a period of two months by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per law, under intimation forthwith to the applicant.
5. It is made clear that nothing has been commented upon the merits of the case.
The OA is disposed of accordingly.
Miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, also stand disposed of.
There is no order as to costs.
(Justice Anil Kumar Ojha)
Member (J)
Ak/-
Amit Kumar