Central Administrative Tribunal
Kishan Kumar vs FINANCE on 6 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Original Application No. 332/00693/2026
This the 06th day of November, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Ojha, Member-J
Kishan Kumar, aged about 33 years, S/o Late Sri Mukesh Kumar, R/o R/222, Rasulpur Mainpuri Bali, Barabanki.
…..Applicant.
By Advocate: Shri Dharmendra Awasthi.
VERSUS.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.
2. Additional Director, Directorate General of Performance Management, Indirect Taxes & Customs, 5th Floor Drum Shaped Building, I.P. Bhawan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
3. Additional Director General Directorate General of Goods & Service Tax Intelligence, Lucknow Zonal Unit, 5th Floor, UPRNSS, G-4/5B Sector 4, Gomti Nagar, Extension, Lucknow, U.P. 226010.
..... Respondents.
By Advocate: Smt. Prayagmati Gupta.
O R D E R (ORAL)
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant would be satisfied if this O.A. is disposed of by giving permission to the applicant to file a fresh representation ventilating his grievances with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the said representation filed by the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time to be fixed by this Tribunal and till then transfer order (Annexure-1) dated 16.06.2026 in respect of the applicant shall be kept in abeyance.
3. To this, learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicant’s representation is directed to be decided in the manner suggested, then a period of at least two months may be allowed for the same.
4. Keeping in view the innocuous prayer made by the applicant, this O.A. is disposed of finally, without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the applicant to prefer a fresh within two weeks from today and respondents/competent authority shall consider and decide the said representation filed by the applicant within a period of two months from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law and relevant rules by passing a reasoned and speaking order under intimation to the applicant. Till the disposal of fresh representation, transfer order (Annexure-1) dated 16.06.2026 in respect of the applicant shall be kept in abeyance.
5. The O.A. stands disposed of as above with no order as to costs.
(Justice Anil Kumar Ojha)
Member (J)
Ak/-
Amit Kumar