Central Administrative Tribunal
hari ram vs DEPARTMENT OF POSTS on 6 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW 7/5, GOMTI NAGAR EXTENSION, LUCKNOW Order Sheet Item no.: 11 Diary No: 4188/2026 [ OLD PENSION SCHEME ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 06/11/2026 HARI RAM Vs DEPARTMENT OF POSTS
For Applicant(s) Advocate : ANURUDH KUMAR SINGH
For Respondent(s) Advocate : PRAYAGMATI GUPTA Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records. Registry has raised the objection with regard to limitation. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that matter relates to pension, hence, it is recurring cause of action. Learned counsel for the respondents also argued that matter is time barred. In view of the above, applicant is directed to reply to the objections raised by Registry as well as learned counsel for the respondents within a week. List the matter on 20.11.2026. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA Member (J) Jn Singh ( ps )