Central Administrative Tribunal
Rahmat Ali vs EXPENDITURE on 6 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW 7/5, GOMTI NAGAR EXTENSION, LUCKNOW Order Sheet Item no.: 15 O.A./667/2026 (LUCKNOW) [ TRANSFER ] With REJECTING I.R. Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 4 Order Dated: 06/11/2026 RAHMAT ALI Vs EXPENDITURE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : PRAVEEN KUMAR
For Respondent(s) Advocate : PRAYAGMATI GUPTA Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records. Learned counsel for the parties informed that objections against interim relief and reply to the same have been filed in the Registry, which are not on record. In view of the above, Registry is directed to trace out the aforesaid objections and reply and place them on record. List the matter on 13.11.2026 for disposal of interim relief. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA Member (J) Jn Singh ( ps )