Armed Forces Tribunal
Jasmer Singh vs Union of India on 2 November 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH CHANDIGARH
AT CHANDIMANDIR
-.-
OA 135 of 2023
Monday, the 02nd day of November, 2026
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE AIR MARSHAL MANAVENDRA SINGH, MEMBER (A)
Jasmer Singh
…… Applicant
(By Manoj Arora, Advocate)
Versus
Union of India and others
…… Respondents
(By Satinder Singh, Sr. PC through VC)
-.-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
According to learned counsel for the applicant in absence of Ledger Account of the individual, the corrected retirement gratuity payment cannot be ascertained. Learned counsel for the respondents admits that he has not annexed the Ledger Account of the applicant with the reply. Learned counsel for the applicant has placed before us a printout of AFCAO website giving the figure of gratuity is Rs.20,00,000/- whereas the applicant had only been paid Rs.14,00,000/-. Learned counsel for the respondents is directed to file Ledger Account of the applicant along with calculation chart and explain why Rs.14,00,000/- of gratuity has been paid to the applicant instead of Rs.20,00,000/- when their own AFCAO website is showing Rs.20,00,000/-. List on 10.12.2026.
(Air Marshal Manavendra Singh)
(Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma) Member (A)
Member (J) 02nd Nov, 2026 ‘MK’