Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50114/2017 of KUSUM AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 29 December 2017
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50114-2017 Decided on: 29.12.2017 Kusum and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present : Ms. H.K. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners. G.S. Sandhawalia , J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-50114-2017Decided on: 29.12.2017
Kusum and another
— Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEK G.S. SAANDHAWALTA
Present :Ms. H.K. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners.G.S. Sandhawalia_ J. (Oral)
In the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., thepetitioners seek directions to respondents No.2 and 3 for protecting the lifeand liberty and not to interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners.Similarly, directions are also sought to respondents No.4 to 6 not tointerfere in the married life of the petitioners who are stated to be relativesof petitioner No.1.
It is pleaded that they have got married on 21.12.2017 at ShivDurga Mandir, Sector-19, Panchkula according to Hindu rites and ritualswith their own sweet will. The photographs of the marriage have beenappended as Annexure P-3. The date of birth of petitioner No.1! is stated tbe 09.10.1998 as per Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-1) and stated to be 19years and 2 months of age. Similarly, date of birth of petitioner No.2 isStated to be 01.02.1994 as per Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-2) and stated tobe 23 years and 10 months of age.
It is further the case of the petitioners that representation dated CRM-M-50]14-2017
21.12.2017 (Annexurre P-4) has been filed with respondent No.2 in thisregard and resultantly the present petition has been filed.
Notice of motion|
Mr. C.S. Bakshi, Addl. AG, Haryana accepts notice onbehalf of the respondents No.1 to 3. Copy of the paper-book has beensupplied.
After hearing counsel for the petitioners, withoutcommenting upon the validity/legality of the marriage or the age of thepetitioners and keeping in view the binding precedent of the Hon'bleApex Court in Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another 2006(2) SCC(Criminal) 478, the present petition is disposed of with direction torespondents No.2 & 3 to look into the above said representation filed bythe petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with law andprovide protection, if so required.
(G.S. SANDHAWALITADECEMBER 29, 2017JUDGE
Naveen
Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/NoWhether Reportable:Yes/No