Central Administrative Tribunal
ANIL KUMAR PANDEY vs EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) on 2 November 2026
Item No. 14/ C-II O.A. No. 27/2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench: New Delhi
O.A. No. 27/2026
This the 02nd day of November, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap Member (A)
DR ANIL KUMAR PANDEY
S/O RAMESHWAR PANDEY
R/O F9/53 BPTP VILLA, SECTOR 88, FARIDABAD, HARYANA-121 002
PRESENTLY WORKING AS:
DEAN
ESIC MEDICAL COLLEGE FARIDABAD,
NH-3, KL MEHTA RD, BEHIND BK HOSPITAL, NEW
INDUSTRIAL TOWNSHIP,
FARIDABAD, HARYANA
…Applicant
(By Advocate: Mr. Pragyesh Pratap Singh for Mr. Prateek Dhanda)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. EMPLOYEES' STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL, PANCHDEEP BHAWAN, COMRADE INDRAJEET GUPTA MARG, NEW DELHI-110 002 dir-gen@esic.nic.in
2. CHAIRMAN, EMPLOYEES' STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, THROUGH SECRETARY, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI-110001
…Respondents
(By Advocate: Mr. Pramod K. Tiwary) KSHITIJ SAXENA 2026.11.09 15:31:26+05'30' KSHITIJ SAXENA
Item No. 14/ C-II O.A. No. 27/2026
ORDER (ORAL) Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
By way of the present OA, filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has sought the following reliefs: “(i) Issue an appropriate direction or order quashing the Order dated 22.12.2025 issued by the Respondents;
(ii) Issue an appropriate direction or order quashing the Order dated 08.08.2025 issued by the Respondents;
(iii) Pass any further order as this Hon'ble Tribunal sees fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that he has already filed reply on behalf of the respondents.
3. Learned proxy counsel for the applicant, under instructions, submits that the present OA has become infructuous and he seeks permission to withdraw the present OA.
4. Permission sought is granted. The OA stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
(Rajinder Kashyap) (R.N. Singh) Member (A) Member (J)
/ks/ KSHITIJ SAXENA 2026.11.09 15:31:26+05'30' KSHITIJ SAXENA