Central Administrative Tribunal
AJAY KUMAR SHARMA vs HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE on 2 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH
61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001
Order Sheet
Item no.: 30
M.A./271/2025 (DELHI)
[ DIRECTION ]
In
M.A./1969/2024
EXECUTION
With
M.A./888/2026
MODIFICATION OF ORDER
Court No.: 2
No of Adjournment: 23
Order Dated: 02/11/2026
AJAY KUMAR SHARMA
Vs
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : In Person
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. S N Verma, Mr. Ravi Kumar, AAO
Order of The Tribunal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sh. S N Verma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, invites our attention to an additional affidavit stated to be compliance affidavit filed on 30.10.2026. He submits that the respondents have passed an order dated 20.08.2026, regarding status of payment towards NPS, and office memorandum dated 10.10.2024, regarding grant of non-productivity linked bonus (ad hoc bonus to Central Government employees for the year 2023- 2024). He further submits that as per OM dated 18.09.2019 of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, available on page no. 9 of the affidavit filed on 30.10.2026, the applicant is also not entitled for HPCA/PCA.
2. On the other hand, the applicant, who appears in person, submits that he has been terminated illegally by the respondents and the order of termination was set aside by this Tribunal and further judgment of the Tribunal was upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. In this background, the applicant is entitled for all the benefits.
3. A copy of the office memorandum dated 18.09.2019, is not a legible one. Sh. S N Verma, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that he will place on record a legible copy of the said memorandum.
4. However, on face of it, we find that the same is applicable to Group 'A' and 'B' (non-ministerial employees). Prima facie, we are of the view that directions of the Tribunal have not been fully implemented. Showing indulgence, further three weeks' time as a last opportunity is granted to the respondents to file an affidavit indicating full compliance of directions of the Tribunal.
5. List on 30.11.2026.
Rajinder Kashyap Member (A) R. N. Singh Member (J) Akansha Soni ( steno 'd' )