Central Administrative Tribunal

KOULESHWAR PRAJAPATI vs DEFENCE on 6 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Patna

Bench

HON’BLE M

HON’BLE MR

Koulesh

Village:

(Jharkha

- By Advocate

Union of

New Delh

The Depu

Departme

110001.

3.

Additiona

General's

New Delh

Principal

PIN-8000

O.I.C. R

(Jharkhan

By Adv

Per: JUS

1.

Counsel

2.

Counsel

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIV

PATNA BENCH, PA

Circuit Bench at Ra

O.A./051/00522 of 2

M.A. No.414/202

CORAM

MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUM

R. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA

hwar Prajapati, Son of Shri Bhu

: Parsotiya, Ward No. 4, P.O R

and), PIN: 829122.

e(s): - None.

-Versus-

f India, Ministry of Defence thro

hi, PIN-110001.

uty Secretary to the Governmen

ent of Expenditure, E-III, A Br

al Director General of Man Po

s Branch I.H.Q. of MoD (Army

hi-110066.

Controller of Defence Account

019.

Records, Records The Sikh

nd) PIN-829122.

vocate(s) :- Shri Pravin Kumar

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

[ORAL]

STICE NARENDRA KUMAR l for the applicant is not present. l for the Opposite Parties is prese OA No. 522 of 2026 VE TRIBUNAL ATNA anchi.

Date of Order:-06.11.2026. MAR JOHARI, MEMBER (J) A, MEMBER (A) uneshwar Prajapati, Resident of Ramgarh Cantt. Distt. -Ramgarh ……. Applicant. ough its Secretary, South Block, nt of India, Ministry of Finance, ranch, North Block, New Delhi ower (MP 8 (1 of R), Adjutant y), West Block -III, R.K.Puram, t, Rajendra Path, Patna (Bihar), Regiment, Ramgarh Cantt. ……Opposite Parties. r Pandey. R R JOHARI, MEMBER (J)

ent. . f h

, , i t , , . . Digitally signed by BINAY PRASAD BINAY PRASA D

Patna Bench

3. Even in applican behalf o one app was list behalf o applican call non has lost

4. In view

5. M.A. N

(Kumar Raje Member

BP.

n second call, neither anyone h nt nor any application for adj of the applicant. The case was f peared on behalf of the applicant ted for 18.09.2026, again on 1 of the applicant. On next date, nt appeared & sought adjournm ne is present to represent to app his interest with regard to presen of the above, the O.A. is dismis No. 414/2026 also stands disposed esh Chandra) (Just (A) OA No. 522 of 2026 has appeared on behalf of the ournment has been moved on first listed on 18.08.2026 but no t on that date thereafter the case 8.09.2026 no one appeared on i.e. on 09.10.2026 counsel for ment but today again on revised plicant. It appears that applicant nt O.A. sed for want of prosecution. d of according. tice Narendra Kumar Johari) Member (J) e n o e n r d t Digitally signed by BINAY PRASAD BINAY PRASA D

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead