Delhi High Court

LPA/851/2023 of LOKESH KUMAR AND ORS Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~1(SDB)

*

IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: 5th November, 2026

Uploaded on: 10th November, 2026

CNRNo :

DLHC010561582023

+

LPA 851/2023 & CM APPL. 77268/2026

LOKESH KUMAR AND ORS

.....Appellants

Through:

Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Mr. Tanishq

Juneja and Mr. Shashwat Sharin,

Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms.

Prabhsahay

Kaur

(Standing

Counsel),

Mr.

Aditya

Verma,

Advocates for DDA.

Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel

for MCD with Ms. Rajbala, Ms. Payal

Rajput, Mr. Vaibhav Tripathi, Advs.

and Mr. Vinay Kumar Tripathi,

Deputy Secretary IDMC.

Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC

with Mr. Divanshu, Adv.

Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel

for MCD with Mr. Raghav Gupta, Ms.

Shashi Gupta and Mr. Arnav Gupta,

Advs. for MCD.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 77268/2026

2. This is an application moved by the Appellants under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking withdrawal of the present LPA.

3. The present case relates to the Sriniwas Puri drain, wherein the Appellants, who are residents of the said area had sought various reliefs in the writ petition, which was filed by them i.e., being W.P.(C) 10459/2021 titled ‘Lokesh Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors’. The prayers in the said writ petition were for proper maintenance of the drain, cleaning of the drain, for removal of the silt, construction/repair of the drain at Sriniwas Puri. The prayers in W.P.(C) 10459/2021 read as under: “A. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order and time bound direction to the Respondents to reconstruct all drains in Srinivaspuri area by taking level of floor/bed of drains with high capacity within specific time.

B. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order and time bound direction to the Respondents to ensure proper flow of water and to connect the road side drains to the main drain.

C. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order and time bound direction to the Respondents to cover the road side drains and the main drain in Srinivaspuri area.

D. Order for an enquiry into the public funds spent in the name of cleaning, construction, repair and maintenance of drains in Srinivaspuri by PWD in the last 10 years.

e) Pass any further order(s) which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice.”

4. Order dated 1st September, 2023 was passed by the ld. Single Judge of this Court in this matter, wherein the ld. Single Judge had taken on record various reports filed by the Delhi Jal Board (hereinafter, ‘DJB’), Public Works Department (hereinafter, ‘PWD’), Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘MCD’), etc. and disposed of the writ petition.

5. In the present LPA, various orders have been passed from time to time. On 18th September, 2026, an inspection was ordered under the aegis of Integrated Drain Management Cell (hereinafter, ‘IDMC’) along with all the concerned agencies.

6. Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Special Secretary, IDMC had got the entire area inspected and a report was replaced before this Court. Thereafter, a detailed order was passed on 30th October, 2026. The matter is now listed on 17th December, 2026.

7. In the meantime, the Appellants have filed this application stating that they would not like to press the present appeal in view of the continuous threats they are facing from the local residents.

8. In view of the application of the Appellants, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

9. However, owing to the large scale impact of the drain on the general water logging in the area, as also the rampant illegal construction upon and around the drain, this is a fit case for the Court to not ignore the facts that have come to light in the various reports including the recent inspection report of the IDMC. Accordingly, the Court takes suo moto cognisance of the situation relating to the Sriniwas Puri Drain. Let the inspection report which was filed by the IDMC and the status report filed by the DJB and other authorities in this case shall now be moved into the new file of writ petition titled Re: Suo Moto Sriniwaspuri Drain. The record of the entire appeal shall now be a part of the said writ petition. Let a fresh number be allocated by the Registry to the said writ petition.

10. Mr. Sashwat Sarin, ld. Counsel is appointed as amicus curiae to assist the Court in this new writ petition. Respondents in memo of parties of the present LPA shall become the Respondents in memo of parties of the said writ petition.

11. List Re: Suo Moto Sriniwaspuri Drain on 17th December, 2026.

12. Next date of hearing in this matter stands cancelled.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA JUDGE NOVEMBER 5, 2026/dk/ck

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead