Central Administrative Tribunal
Rishabh Maan vs Satish Golcha, Commissioner of Police, DELHI POLICE and another on 4 November 2026
Item No. 22 (Court-4)
Central Admi
Principal B
C.P. No. 379/2
This the 04
th
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Gar
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S Kha
Rishab Maan, Roll No. 220
(Min.) in Delhi Police, Age
S/o Sh. Sanjay Maan, R/o H
Mundka Village, Delhi-110
(By Advocate: Mr. Anil Si
V
1. Sh. Satish Golcha, Earlie
Police when CP was filed, P
Road, New Delhi-110001.
2. Sh. Sanjay Singh, Earlier
(Recruitment) when CP wa
Kingsway Camp, Delhi-110
3. Sh. Anurag Kumar, Com
Police, PHQ, Jai Singh Roa
110001.
4. Sh. S D Bhaskar, DCP (R
Kingsway Camp, Delhi-110
(By Advocate: Ms. Neelim
---
inistrative Tribunal
Bench, New Delhi
2026 IN O.A. No. 47/2025
day of November, 2026
g, Member (J)
ati, Member (A)
01346838, Recruit HC
ed about 28 Years,
House No. 335,
0041.
...Pet
ingal, Mr. Tanmay Vashisth
Versus
er Commissioner of
PHQ, Jai Singh
r DCP
as filed,, NPL,
0009.
mmissioner of
ad, New Delhi-
Recruitment) NPL
0009.
...Responden
ma Rathore)
--
C.P. No. 379/2026
itioner
ha)
nts
SURAJ
BISHT
SURAJ
BISHT
Item No. 22 (Court-4)
att
Sp thi
rea
rep
2.
Co
vie
C.P
3.
app
in
(D
M
/sb/
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manis At the outset, learned cou tention to the order passe pecial Leave Petition (Ci .10.2026, wherein the Hon is Tribunal dated 20.11.202 ady reference, the relevant produced hereinbelow: “5. In the meanwhile, order p Principal Bench, New Delhi in In view of the aforesai ourt, staying the order of t ew that no useful purpose w P. pending at this stage. Accordingly, the present plicant to agitate any surviv accordance with law. Notic Dr. Anand S Khati) Member (A)
R (ORAL) sh Garg, Member (J):- unsel for the respondents ha ed by the Hon’ble Suprem
ivil) Diary No(s). 46851/ n’ble Court stayed the orde 25 in O.A. No. 47/2025. Fo t portion of the aforesaid passed by the Central Administr n O.A. No. 47/2025, shall remai d directions of the Hon’b his Tribunal, we are of th would be served by keeping C.P. stands closed, with l ving grievance, if the occas ces issued, if any, stand disc
(Ma M C.P. No. 379/2026 as drawn our me Court in /2026 dated er passed by or the sake of judgment is rative Tribunal, in stayed.” ble Supreme e considered g the present liberty to the sion so arise, charged. anish Garg) Member (J) SURAJ BISHT SURAJ BISHT