ANSHU KUMARI vs DSSSB (GNCTD) on 2 November 2026

1. De Delh Instit Centr

2. D NCT

3. G (Edu

(By A

Central Administrativ Principal Bench, N

O.A. No. 4349/2 This the 02nd day of Nov ’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Membe ’ble Dr. Anand S Khati, Memb HU KUMARI, W/o Shri Rahul Kuma RS, Flat No. 195, Delhi Administratio ok, Vihar phase- IV, New Delhi-11005

Advocate: Mr. Tanmay Vashistha) Versus elhi Subordinate Service Selection Bo i Subordinate Services Selection B tutional Area, Karkardooma, Nea re, Delhi-110092. irectorate of Education Through its T of Delhi Old Secretariate, Delhi 1100 Govt. Of NCT of Delhi Through cation) Old Secretariat, Sham Nath M Advocate: Mr. H A Khan, Mr. Shadab

---

ve Tribunal New Delhi vember, 2026 er (J) ber (A) ar, Aged about 41 on Flats, Nimri Colony,

...Applicant ard The Chairman Board (DSSSB) FC-18, ar Railway Reservation director Government of

054. the Principal Secretary Marg Delhi – 54. ...Respondents

b Hussain Khan, Mr. Amit Anand)

SURAJ BISHT SURAJ BISHT

Item No.07 (Court-4)

In Adminis followin “ ce an pe (i an (i ac pa re (i ci

2. A applicant seeking d shift-wis reconside (Social S the respo a directi represent prescribe

ORDER (ORAL Hon’ble Mr. Manish Ga n the present Original Application strative Tribunals Act, 1985, the ng reliefs:

(i) To Direct the Respondents ertified/downloadable copies of her resp nd all evaluation records relating to b ermissible redactions; and/or

ii) To Direct the Respondent to consider nd/or

iii) Direct the Respondents to disclose the ctually applied to the Applicant, tog arameters and shift-wise data to the exte elevant to verification of the Applicant's m

iv) Pass any order this tribunal may ircumstances of present case.” At the outset, learned counsel for t submitted a representation date disclosure of answer of answer sh se normalization data, review eration of candidature for the po Science). However, the same is sti ondents. He further submits that th ion is issued to the respondent tation by way of a reasoned ed time frame.

L) arg, Member (J):- n, filed under Section 19 of the applicant has prayed for the to furnish to the Applicant ponse sheets/evaluated answer sheets both examinations, subject to legally r the representation of the applicant; e normalization methodology/formula gether with the relevant statistical nt the same is legally disclosable and marks; and/or deem fit and proper in fact and the applicant submits that the ed 10.08.2026 (Annexure A-1) heets, normalization formula and of normalized marks, and osts of TGT (Hindi) and TGT ill pending consideration before he applicant would be satisfied if s to dispose of the aforesaid and speaking order within a

SURAJ BISHT SURAJ BISHT

Item No.07 (Court-4)

3. Is appear an the respo

4. In of the c responde applicant speaking days from

5. Th merits, a disposed

(Dr. A M

/sb/

sue notice. H A Khan and Mr. nd accept notice on behalf of the re ondents seek some time to take app n view of the limited prayer made, case, the present O.A. is dispos ents to consider and decide the t dated 10.08.2026 (Annexure A g order, strictly in accordance with m the date of receipt of a certified c he OA is disposed of in the aforesa at the admission stage itself. Pendin d of accordingly. No order as to cos Anand S Khati) Member (A)

Amit Anand, learned counsel espondents. Learned counsel for propriate instructions. without entering into the merits ed of with a direction to the aforesaid representation of the -1) by passing a reasoned and law, within a period of thirty 30 copy of this order. aid terms, without going into the ng MAs, if any, shall also stand sts. (Manish Garg) Member (J)

SURAJ BISHT SURAJ BISHT