Central Administrative Tribunal
Deepak Kumar Baliarsingh vs CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES on 6 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK Order Sheet Item no.: 15 O.A./627/2026 (CUTTACK) [ REGULARISATION OF SERVICE ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 06/11/2026 DEEPAK KUMAR BALIARSINGH Vs CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
For Applicant(s) Advocate : J.M.Pattnaik, J.R.Behera For Respondent(s) Advocate : J.K.Nayak Order of The Tribunal Heard. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that this OA is not maintainable since the applicant had earlier approached this Bench praying regularization, which was disposed of and there was also interim order not to disengage him till consideration of his case. Ld. counsel for the applicant, on the other hand submitted that since no consideration was made by the authorities to his prayer, he has been forced to approached this Bench again. We find sufficient force in the submission of the Ld Counsel for the applicant and, accordingly, the OA is admitted. Ld. Counsel appearing for the respondents takes notice to file counter within six weeks with copy to other side. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks therefrom. Insofar as interim relief prayed for in this OA is concerned, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is granted 14 days time to file his reply/objection. List the matter on 25.11.2026.
Till the next date of listing, it is directed that status quo of the applicant with regard to his continuance shall be maintained. Copy of the order be given to Ld. Counsel for both the sides. Pramod Kumar Das Member (A) SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA Member (J) Ravi Kumar ( ps )