Madras High Court

CRL OP/30183/2026 of R.Radhakrishnan Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police on 11 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-11-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

CRL.OP.No.30183 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012368992026}

R.Radhakrishnan,

S/o. V.R.N.Ramanathan,

No.25/4, Balaji Apartments, ARK

Colony, Eldams Road, Chennai.

.. Petitioner(s)

Vs.

State Rep by,

The Inspector of Police,

CBI/EOW Chennai.

.. Respondent(s)

PRAYER

To modify the condition i.e “The petitioner shall deposit the said batta amount of Rs.4,22,000/- in the account of the Court on or before 01.10.2026” imposed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.6621 of 2026 by the order dated 03.09.2026.

For Petitioner(s):

Ms.J.Swathy

For Respondent(s):

Mr.V.Ezhilan

for Mr.B.Mohan

Special Public Prosecutor for CBI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Today, when the matter was called, Ms.J.Swathy reports that the petitioner had paid the sum of Rs.4,22,000/- by way of two instalments on 30.10.2026 and on 10.11.2026.

2. By the impugned order, the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai had directed the petitioner to pay the aforesaid sum, so as to enable the summoning of 43 witnesses. Ms.J.Swathy has filed this petition feeling aggrieved over the amount. Even when the matter came up for admission on 16.10.2026, this Court pointed out that as the petitioner had committed an error of not cross examining the 43 witnesses, the prosecution cannot bear the cost of summoning the witnesses once again. It was only thereafter that the amount has been paid.

3. Now that the amount has been paid, the dismissal of the petition for non-payment of the same before 01.10.2026 is set aside. The learned Judge shall issue summons to the witnesses and proceed further with trial in the case, which is posted on 26.11.2026.

4. The matter which is pending before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, is atleast 20 years in age. The learned Trial Judge shall ensure that the matter proceeds with all expedition that it deserves and atleast two effective hearings per week must be granted to the proceedings.

5. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 11-11-2026 krk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To

1. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, CBI/EOW Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. krk Crl.OP.No.30183 of 2026

11-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead