Madras High Court

CRP/7017/2026 of Veerakannan Vs Sathiya on 10 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

Civil Revision Petition No.7017 of 2026

and

C.M.P.No.30149 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012132932026}

Veerakannan

S/o.Palaniswamy

..Petitioner

Vs

1. Sathiya

W/o.Veerakannan

2. Aswathy

D/o.Veerakannan

3. Pavish

S/o.Veerakannan

(Minors represented by their Guardian

Mother Sathiya)

..Respondents

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 04.08.2026 passed in C.M.P.No.505 of 2025 in D.V.C.No.05 of 2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court, Pandalur.

For Petitioner :

Mr.J.Muthukumaran

*****

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.505 of 2025 in

D.V.C.No.5 of 2025 dated 04.08.2026 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pandalur, wherein the application filed by the respondents under Section 23(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, claiming interim maintenance, came to be allowed by the Court below.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and carefully perused the materials available on record. This Court also went through the impugned order.

3. In the considered view of this Court, the petitioner has a right of appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. This will apply even for interim orders passed by the Court below. In the light of an alternate remedy available, this Court is not inclined to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

4. In view of the above, the petitioner is given liberty to file an appeal before the concerned Court within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and work out his remedy.

5. This civil revision petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Registry is directed to return the original order to learned counsel for petitioner to enable the petitioner to file an appeal before the concerned Court. 10-11-2026 Note : Issue order copy by 12.11.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gm To The Judicial Magistrate, Pandalur.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. gm Civil Revision Petition No.7017 of 2026 10-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead