Madras High Court
WP Crl.(MD)/6099/2026 of Ayyanar Vs The Superintendent of Police on 10 November 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6099 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6099 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011547772026}
Ayyanar
S/o, Govindhan,
No.76, Kumaran Street,
Kurinchi Nagar,
Reserve Line,
Madurai-14
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Madurai District,
Madurai.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Oomachikulam Police Station, Madurai.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus To issue aWrit of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take immediate action upon considering the Petitioner's representations dated 03.10.2026, within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner(s)
:M/s Karthik Raja T
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider his representation dated 03.10.2026 and take
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6099 of 2026 appropriate action in accordance with law.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner sent the representation dated 03.10.2026 addressed to the 1st respondent Superintendent of Police, with a copy marked to the 2nd respondent Inspector of Police, through Registered Post on 03.10.2026. However, since no action has been taken on the said representation till date, the petitioner was constrained to approach this Court by filing the present petition.
3. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that though a copy was marked to the 2nd respondent, no instructions have been received from the respondent police so far, and he seeks an accommodation.
4. In response, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to submit a fresh representation directly to the 2nd respondent in person.
5. Recording the aforesaid submissions, the petitioner is directed to appear before the 2nd respondent in person tomorrow i.e., on 11.11.2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6099 of 2026 at 11:00 A.M. and submit a fresh representation along with all supporting documents.
6. Upon receipt of the said representation, the 2nd respondent is directed to receive it immediately, conduct an enquiry upon all necessary parties, and dispose of the representation on its merits in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks thereafter.
7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. 10-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police Madurai District Madurai
2. The Inspector of Police Oomachikulam Police Station, Madurai
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6099 of 2026 DR.P.MURUGAN, J. TM WP Crl.(MD) No. 6099 of 2026 10-11-2026