Madras High Court

WP(MD)/31509/2026 of Tvl. PAPPA FIBRES Vs THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER-1 / THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER on 10 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 31509 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 10-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 31509 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011563022026}

and

WMP(MD) No.24198 of 2026

Tvl. PAPPA FIBRES,

Represented by its Proprietor,

A. Manickam, S/o.Alagarsamy,

Devarappanpatti, Aiyampalayam,

Dindigul District - 624 204.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/

The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,

Nilakottai - 1 Assessment Circle,

Periyar Colony, Madurai Main Road,

Nilakottai - 624 208.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarifed Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to impugned order of the respondent in Ref.No.ZD331225401652V/2021-22 dated 26.12.2025 and quashing the same and consequently directing the respondent to redo the assessment afresh after providing adequate opportunity.

For Petitioner

: Mr.B.Rooban

For Respondent

: Mr.R.Parthiban

Special Government Pleader

*****

WP(MD) No. 31509 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order dated 26.12.2025 is assailed in this Writ Petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.

2. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made.

3. Mr.R.Parthiban, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondent.

4. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. In these circumstances, subject to the remittance of 25% of the tax demand under the impugned order within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside so as to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to contest the matter on merits. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five (5) months from the date of remittance of 25% of the tax demand. Subject to

WP(MD) No. 31509 of 2026 fulfilment of this condition, the bank attachment relating to the impugned order shall be raised.

5. This Writ Petition stands disposed of on the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 10-11-2026 Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation: No JEN To The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Nilakottai - 1 Assessment Circle, Periyar Colony, Madurai Main Road, Nilakottai - 624 208.

WP(MD) No. 31509 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. JEN WP(MD) No. 31509 of 2026 10-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead