Central Administrative Tribunal
ABHISHEK KUMAR vs Health and Family Welfare (GNCTD) on 11 November 2026
Th
H
Hon
Dr Abhishek
Public / Go
(UPSC), Lo
Nagar, Delh
(By Advocat
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Govt. of N Through it A-Wing, 5 Delhi Secr
2. Medical D Office Add Hospital, De
3. Dr Sudha Past AMS Currently department
4. Dr Virend DMS/CCM Office Add 110054
(By Advocat
Central Administrative T Principal Bench, New OA No. 4067/2026 hursday, this the 15th day of Oc on'ble Justice Ranjit More, n'ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, k Kumar, S/o Devinder Kum ovt official presently working oknayak Hospital, Delhi, R hi-110051 te: Applicant in person) Versus NCT of Delhi ts Principal Secretary 5th Floor retariat, IP Estate, New Delhi Director, Loknayak hospital dress – Medical Director (M elhi-110002 a Rani Aggarwal of Sushruta Trauma Centre, D working as medical of t of Loknayak Hospital, Delhi- dra Kumar MO Casualty department dress – Sushruta Trauma cent te: Mr. S H Khan for Mr. H A
Tribunal Delhi ctober, 2026 Chairman , Member (A) mar, Aged 36 years, A g as Medical Officer R/o F-19/15 Krishna … Applicant .D) Office, Loknayak Delhi fficer in Pediatrics -110002 tre, Civil lines, Delhi- …Respondents Khan) GAGAN MALIK GAGAN MALIK
Per: Justic
Havin learned pro appropriate following or Respo consider an 11.08.2025 with law, b expeditiousl the date of r
2. Accor terms. Pend
3. It is m an expressio
4. In th representati be at libert proceedings law.
( Rajind
Me
gm
O R D E R (ORAL) ce Ranjit More, Chairman ng heard the applicant, who ap oxy counsel for the respon e to dispose of the present rder: ondent No. 2/competent aut nd decide the applicant’s r (Annexure A-1), independent by passing a reasoned and ly as possible, preferably wit receipt of a copy of this order. dingly, the OA stands dispose ding MA(s), if any, shall also s made clear that this order shal on of opinion on the merits of he event that the decision ion is adverse to the applican ty to challenge the same b s before the appropriate forum der Kashyap ) ( Justi ember (A) C
) n ppears in person, and ndents, we deem it OA by passing the thority is directed to representation dated tly and in accordance speaking order, as thin four weeks from . ed of in the aforesaid stand disposed of. ll not be construed as f the case. n on the aforesaid nt’s interests, he shall by filing appropriate m, in accordance with ce Ranjit More ) Chairman GAGAN MALIK GAGAN MALIK