Central Administrative Tribunal

Shaik Rannu Hussain vs DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD (TELANGANA)

NO. 5-10-193, 1ST FLOOR, HACA BHAVAN,HYDERABAD - 500004

Order Sheet

Item no.: 6

O.A./844/2026 (TELANGANA)

[ PROMOTION ]

Court No.: 1

No of Adjournment: 1

Order Dated: 05/11/2026

SHAIK RANNU HUSSAIN

Vs

DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : K SUDHAKER REDDY

For Respondent(s) Advocate :

Order of The Tribunal

Counsel for the applicant would like to submit the facts of the case as under:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. In pursuance of the Notification published in the Employment News, dt.18.11.2008, the applicant applied for the post of Cat-I Trainee, got selected and joined the respondent organisation as a Category-I Trainee on 23-12-2009.

2. After completion of one year’s training, the applicant was posted as ‘Scientific Asst - B’ (SA-B). Prior to such joining, the applicant was pursuing B.Tech in Chemical Engineering at Andhra University Visakapatnam through correspondence mode, and completed the course in the year 2014.

3. Counsel for the applicant contends that, in terms of the guidelines issued in respect of obtaining Additional Qualification, the applicant, with the permission of the competent authority, accorded, vide letter, dt.22.01.2015, acquired the qualification of AMICHe, Chemical Engineering, and, therefore, the applicant, who has completed the requisite tenure of service as Scientist-E, is entitled for promotion to the post of Technical Officer.

4. In earlier round of litigation, the applicant filed O.A./265/2026, which was disposed of, vide order, dt.23.03.2026, with directions to the Respondents to dispose of the applicant’s representation, dt.12.08.2025.

5. In pursuance of the same, the Respondents, vide impugned order, dt.06.10.2026, rejected the applicant’s claim on various ground including the suppression of information. Issue notice to the Respondents. Four weeks’ time is granted to the Respondents to file a reply to the O.A. List the case on 21.01.2027 for final hearing.

Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi Member (A) MR MANISH GARG Member (J) Minhajul Haque ( court master )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead