Central Administrative Tribunal

SMT SHANTI DEVI vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 9 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Patna

Bench

HON’BL

HO

Smt. S

Peon

Sri Su

Barba

Saran

1. Sri Ch

Hajip

2. Sri A

Railw

3. Sri Di

Centr

4. Sri V

Centr

For Appl

For Resp

______

1. Heard le

2. This co

disobed

of 2022

CENTRAL ADMINISTRA

PATNA BENCH,

C.P. No. 050/00

ARISING OUT OF OA No

D

C O R A M

LE JUSTICE MR. NARENDRA KU

ON’BLE MR. KUMAR RAJESH C

Shanti Devi, wife of Late Ram

under DRM(P) EC Railway,

ujit Singh, Plot no. 4 Gali No.

atta (infront of Power Hous

n-841101.

Versus

hhatrasal Singh, General Ma

ur, Vaishali (Bihar)-844101.

Amit Saran, Divisional Railw

way Sonpur, Saran (Bihar)-841

ilip Paswan, Divisional Railw

ral Railway Sonpur Saran (Bih

Viraj Kumar, Senior Division

ral Railway, Sonpur, Saran (Bi

licant:-

Mr. Shrikesh K

pondents:-

Mr. T.N. Thak

____________________

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Per: Mr. Kumar Rajesh C earned counsel for both partie ontempt petition has been dience of the order passed by . Para-10 of this order reads a “This OA is disposed observations. The re being directed to take a C.P. No. 050/00104/2025 ATIVE TRIBUNAL , PATNA

. 050/00563/2022 Date of order:- 09.11.2026 M UMAR JOHARI, MEMBER [J] CHANDRA, MEMBER [A] m Lalit Prasad, Ex-Jamadar, Sonpur Now residing at C/o 01, Ward no. 12, Patel Nagar, se), PO+PS-Sonpur, District-

………Petitioner s anager, East Central Railway, way Manager, East Central 1101. way Manager (Personnel) East har)-841101. nal Financial Manager, East ihar)-844101. ……..Respondents Kumar Singh, ld. Adv. kur, ld. Sr. CGSC __________________ R (Oral) Chandra, Member (A): es. n instituted alleging willful this Tribunal in OA No. 563 as follows: d of with the following espondent officials are a decision within 60 days

, o , - r , l t t s l g e s Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI

Patna Bench

3. Learned drawn complia whereby Annexu 01.10.19

4. In view substan this MA CP. Acco is dismi Notices

5. No orde

(Kumar R

Mem

pk/- from the date of rec paper as per contentio with the settled date of

d counsel for the respondents our attention to the order ance of the order passed by y the date of birth has been c re R-1 kept alongwith s

946. w of the above, the order tially complied with. There i A for any substitution which i ordingly, the MA No. 238 of 2 issed. The CP No. 104 of 2 stand discharged. er as to costs. Rajesh Chandra) mber (A)

C.P. No. 050/00104/2025 ceipt of correct pension on of respondent officials f birth i.e., 01.10.1946.” has filed show-cause and has r that has been passed in this Tribunal on 24.10.2025 corrected and recorded as per show-cause application as of the Tribunal has been is no reason for entertaining s not a subject matter of this 2026 for substitution petition 025 is accordingly dropped. (Narendra Kumar Johari)

Member (J)

n s s n r s n g s n . Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead