AMAR NATH vs REVENUE on 9 November 2026

O R D E R

Per: Mr. Kumar Rajesh C learned counsel for both the p der of this Tribunal in OA No. the institution of instant cont disobedience, is as under: For the reasons stated eds with the following dire

(i) Applicant is held pay drawn Rs. 74,300/- and the to issue revised applicant on the 80,200/-:

(ii) Consequently, t respondents eff 6,90,894/- from also unjustified b respondents are and refund su recovered from t

RI-845401 (BIHAR) & HIS ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OFFICE TOMS, (PREVENTION) HQ, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, 800001& HIS SUCCESSOR. ……..Respondents t, ld. Adv. kur, ld. Sr. CGSC umar, ld. ASC __________________ R (Oral) Chandra, Member (A): parties. . 541 of 2021, which has given tempt petition for the alleged d hereinabove, the OA ections: d to be entitled to have last 80,200/- instead of Rs. e respondents are directed d PPO in favour of the basis of last pay drawn Rs. this Tribunal finds that ffecting recovery of Rs. DCRG of the applicant is being against the rules. The e hereby directed to verify uch amount if already the applicant:

S E , , , s n d A t . d e . t . s e y y Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI

Patna Bench

3. Learne para-24 been co 25 whi interest

4. Learne affidavi been fu Bench the un- of para on pay amount

(iii) Since the applica last pay draw truncation, the r re-calculate and last pay drawn:

25. The directions, as complied with by the r months from the date copy of this order faili rate as may be specifi the Central Governmen of gratuity which is th on Provident Fund am required to be paid aft such interest be pa gratuity.” d counsel for the petitioner 4 the substantive part i.e., par omplied with. The only bone ch as per his assessment is t amount that has been paid. d counsel for the responde it and has also argued that t ully complied with. He has to para-9 and para-10 of the -contesting para- 24, the detai a-25 of the OA has been given arrears/refund amount as w t.

ant is held entitled to have wn fixed without any respondents are directed to re-fix his pension on such ordained above, shall be respondents within three of receipt of a certified ing which, the interest at ied from time to time to nt employees on amount he interest as admissible mount from time to time fter three months but no aid on the amount of has clearly admitted that in ra- 24(i), (ii) & (iii) have fully of contention relates to para- the wrong calculation of the ents has filed a compliance the order of the Tribunal has drawn the attention of this e affidavit where apart from ils with regard to compliance n with a break-up of interest well as interest on leave salary e y o h e e d t o t e e o f n y - e e s s m e t y Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI

Patna Bench

5. Learne and file the inte not bee calculat

6. In view the Tri nothing Contem

7. No orde

(Kumar R

Mem

pk/- d counsel for the petitioner ha ed a rejoinder where in para erest has not been calculated en able to file any chart as to h ted correctly. w of the above, this Tribunal is ibunal has been substantial g in this CP to be adjudica mpt Petition is dropped. Notic er as to costs. Rajesh Chandra) mber (A)

C.P. No. 050/0087/2025 as objected to this calculation a-3 he has simply stated that d correctly. However, he has how this interest has not been s of the view that the order of lly complied with. There is ated upon. Accordingly, the ces stand discharged. (Narendra Kumar Johari)

Member (J)

n t s n f s e Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI