RAJESH KUMAR vs BSNL on 9 November 2026

O R D E R

Per: Mr. Kumar Rajesh C learned counsel for both the

In O.A. No. 050/000433/2025 ATIVE TRIBUNAL , PATNA of 2025

Date of order:- 09.11.2026 M UMAR JOHARI, MEMBER [J] CHANDRA, MEMBER [A] handrika Prasad, resident of , Bazar Samiti Road, New d working as Joint Chief

………Applicant s he Chairman-cum-Managing an, Harish Chandra Mathur at Sanchar Bhawan, Harish 110001. BW), BSNL CO:BW Unit,

6. lecom, BSNL, Bihar Circle, Zone, Telephone Bhawan, R Bihar Civil Zone, 4th Floor, a-800001. ……..Respondents Baria, ld. Advocate d through VC mode Thakur, ld. Sr. CGSC dhav Krishna __________________ R (Oral) Chandra, Member (A): parties.

f w f g r h , , R , s Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI

Patna Bench

2. This m that pe this M

3. Lookin proffer concer benchm (Annex

4. Learne pressin

5. Comin and b

28.09. averre 12.05.2 impug delay s

6. Learne where, in para has alr in par concer challen

01.04. rejecte appeal listed i matter is pending for consider ertains to condonation of del A has already been filed. ng at the application we fin red for condonation of delay rned that pertains to the a mark in APAR for per xure A-13). ed counsel for the applicant ng for this particular relief. ng to the second prayer for co below benchmark endorsed .2019-31.03.2020 and 01.0 d in para-4 of the MA tha 2025 which is within a pe gned memorial order dated should be condoned. ed counsel for the responden , since the counsel for applica a-8.1, he does not intend to fu ready opposed this prayer as w ra-5 of this objection. So fa rned he has stated that the nged is dated 10.07.2023 wh 2021-31.03.2022. The chall ed on 10.07.2023. Subseque l against this rejection orde in relief column of para- 8.3 c “There is no provisio against the decision of taken in compliance w 14.05.2009 (copy attac period 2008-09 onward

In O.A. No. 050/000433/2025 ration of MA No. 712 of 2025 lay in filing this OA. Reply to nd that there is no ground y so far as relief para-8.1 is adverse remarks and below iod 28.09.2019-31.03.2020 t has averred that he is not ontesting the adverse remark d in the APAR for period 04.2021-31.03.2022 he has at he has filed this OA on eriod of one year from the 31.05.2024, and hence, the t has filed a reply to this MA ant has not pressed the relief urnish any answer though he well in his reply as mentioned far as the relief para-8.2 is original order that is being hich relates to APAR period lenge to this remark was ently, the applicant filed an er. The impugned order as clearly mentions that: on for appeal/memorial f the competent authority with the DoP&T OM dated ched) for the APAR from ds.”

o d s w t k d s n e e A f e d s g d s n s l y d m Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI

Patna Bench

10.07.2 count 31.05.2 emerg from th

7. Learne the vir above no. 712 justify stands

8. No ord

(Kumar

Me

pk/-

Hence, filing of an app 2023 when no such provisio the period from the commu 2024 is definitely not permiss ed on 10.07.2023 and the pe his date. ed counsel for applicant has n res of this particular DoP&T in the OA or MA for condona 2 of 2025 is dismissed for w the delay. Accordingly, the s disposed of. der as to costs. r Rajesh Chandra) (N ember (A)

MA No. 712/2025

In O.A. No. 050/000433/2025 peal against this order of n exists for the same and to unication of the order dated sible. The cause of action has eriod of delay will be counted not challenged the validity or T OM referred to in para 6 ation of delay. Hence, the MA want of any cogent reason to e OA No. 433 of 2025 also Narendra Kumar Johari) Member (J)

f o d s d r

A o o Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI