Central Administrative Tribunal
Dr M P Paulton vs ICAR on 10 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 30 O.A./74/2026 (ERNAKULAM) [ UPGRADATION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 5 Order Dated: 10/11/2026 DR M P PAULTON Vs ICAR For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. M.R. Anison For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mrs. K.V. Bhadrakumari, Mr. Rinu G Aswan ACGSC Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal
It is submitted by the learned ACGSC that separate reply statement is not proposed to be filed. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have filed reply statement. Learned Counsel for the applicant is granted time to file rejoinder, if any. Post on 05.01.2027. V RAMA MATHEW MEMBER (A) JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MEMBER (J) Reshmi R ( )
Case No O.A./74/2026 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 30 Generated by Reshmi CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 10/11/2026
11/11/2026, 09:14 cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=84769 https://cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=84769 1/1 2026.11.11 09:30:13+ 05'30' A X Sherin