Gujarat High Court

SCA/7208/1996 of DHIRAJLAL HIRACHAND MODI AND BROS. Vs SUPPLY SUPERVISOR on 26 November 1996

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7208 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7208 of 1996

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

-------------------------------------------------------------- DHIRAJLAL HIRACHAND MODI AND BROS.Versus SUPPLY SUPERVISOR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DM AHUJA for Petitioner MR A.J. DESAI, LD.GOVT.COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE Date of decision: 26/11/96

ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Ld. Govt. Counsel Mr. A.J.Desai waives the service of the rule.

Upon hearing learned counsels for the parties, it appears that, the present petition can be disposed of in a manner indicated hereinafter.

The authority who has passed the impugned orders dated August 07,1996, shall release and return the essential commodity in question, on the petitioner furnishing the security to the satisfaction of that officer. This should be done as soon as the above said security is furnished by the petitioner. Petition stands disposed of with the above said orders, leaving upon all the questions to be decided regarding the seizure etc., by the said authority at the appropriate time. Rule is made absolute to the above said extent only. D.S. permitted.

-----

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead