Madras High Court
WP(MD)/23162/2022 of Tamil Nadu Street Vending Workers Federation Vs The Commissioner of Municipal Administration on 12 November 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
WP(MD) No. 23162 of 2022
CNR:{HCMD010960622022}
Tamil Nadu Street Vending Workers Federation Represented by its Secretary, P.Nagendran, S/o. Palani, 5-A, Kasthuribhai Nagar, Melur, Madurai.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply, Fort St.George, Chennai.
2. The Director of Municipal Administration, Urban Administration Building Campus, 75, Santhome High Road, Chennai -25.
3. The District Collector,
Office of the District Collector,,
Madurai District.
4. The Municipality Commissioner,
Melur Municipality,
Madurai District.
5. L.Kuppuraj
S/o. Lakshman,
No. 84, Adambur, Avudaiyar Kovil Taluk,
Pudukottai District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondent No.4 to restrain Respondent No.5 and his men from collecting unauthorized fee or amount from the members of the Petitioner's Association and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 to levy fee or charges in accordance with the Tamil Nadu Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme and Rules from the members of petitioner association, 2015.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr.R.Alagumani
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.S.I.Muthiah, Addl. Govt. Pleader
for R1 to R3
Mr.G.Suriya Anandh for R4
Mr.R.Ilayaraja for R5
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) (P.VELMURUGAN J.) 12-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No bala
To
1. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply, Fort St.George, Chennai.
2. The Director of Municipal Administration, Urban Administration Building Campus, 75, Santhome High Road, Chennai -25.
3. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector,, Madurai District.
4. The Municipality Commissioner, Melur Municipality, Madurai District.
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J. AND P.VELMURUGAN, J. bala WP(MD)No.23162 of 2022 12-11-2026