Madras High Court

WP(MD)/23162/2022 of Tamil Nadu Street Vending Workers Federation Vs The Commissioner of Municipal Administration on 12 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 12-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

WP(MD) No. 23162 of 2022

CNR:{HCMD010960622022}

Tamil Nadu Street Vending Workers Federation Represented by its Secretary, P.Nagendran, S/o. Palani, 5-A, Kasthuribhai Nagar, Melur, Madurai.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply, Fort St.George, Chennai.

2. The Director of Municipal Administration, Urban Administration Building Campus, 75, Santhome High Road, Chennai -25.

3. The District Collector,

Office of the District Collector,,

Madurai District.

4. The Municipality Commissioner,

Melur Municipality,

Madurai District.

5. L.Kuppuraj

S/o. Lakshman,

No. 84, Adambur, Avudaiyar Kovil Taluk,

Pudukottai District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondent No.4 to restrain Respondent No.5 and his men from collecting unauthorized fee or amount from the members of the Petitioner's Association and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 to levy fee or charges in accordance with the Tamil Nadu Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme and Rules from the members of petitioner association, 2015.

For Petitioner(s)

:Mr.R.Alagumani

For Respondent(s)

:Mr.S.I.Muthiah, Addl. Govt. Pleader

for R1 to R3

Mr.G.Suriya Anandh for R4

Mr.R.Ilayaraja for R5

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in the writ petition is rendered infructuous.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) (P.VELMURUGAN J.) 12-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No bala

To

1. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply, Fort St.George, Chennai.

2. The Director of Municipal Administration, Urban Administration Building Campus, 75, Santhome High Road, Chennai -25.

3. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector,, Madurai District.

4. The Municipality Commissioner, Melur Municipality, Madurai District.

SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J. AND P.VELMURUGAN, J. bala WP(MD)No.23162 of 2022 12-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead