Madras High Court

CONT P/120/2026 of J.Sivaprakasam Vs Gunasekaran and another on 11 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CONT P No. 120 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

CONT P No. 120 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012992472025}

J.Sivaprakasam

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. Gunasekaran and another

Managing Director, TNSTC (Salem) Ltd.,

12, Ramakrishna Salai, Salem - 636 007.

2. Selvam, The General Manager,

TNSTC ( Salem ) Ltd.,

Dharmapuri Region, No.9/53 Salem Main

Road, Bharathipuram, Dharmapuri - 636 701

..Contemnor(s)

Contempt Petition filed under Clause 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Respondents for their wilful and intentional disobedience and non- compliance of the orders and directions of this Hon'ble Court dated 25.09.2024

in WP.No.20998 of 2013.

For Petitioner(s):

M/s.R.Krishnasamy,

For Contemnor(s):

Mr.K.Raja, Standing Counsel

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 25.09.2024 passed in W.P.No.20998 of 2013. __________

( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 12:33:02 pm )

CONT P No. 120 of 2026

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Mr. Raja, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, filed a compliance memo and submits that the petitioner has already been paid all the amounts due and payable in terms of the orders passed by this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner confirms the same, and submits that the calculation made by the respondents is not correct and seeks liberty to take appropriate steps.

4. In the light of the above, this Court is convinced that the respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court and, accordingly, this contempt petition is closed. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner has got any grievance with regard to the calculation made by the respondents, it is open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps against the same. No costs. 11-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No skr __________

( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 12:33:02 pm )

CONT P No. 120 of 2026 To

1. The Managing Director, TNSTC (Salem) Ltd., 12, Ramakrishna Salai, Salem - 636 007.

2. The General Manager, TNSTC ( Salem ) Ltd., Dharmapuri Region, No.9/53 Salem Main Road, Bharathipuram, Dharmapuri - 636 701. __________

( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 12:33:02 pm )

CONT P No. 120 of 2026 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR J. skr CONT P No. 120 of 2026 11-11-2026 __________

( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 12:33:02 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead