Madras High Court

WP/45212/2026 of S. Muruganatham Vs The District collector on 11 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 45212 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 45212 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012583742026}

S. Muruganatham,

S/o Saminathan Pillai,

Pillaiyar Kovil Street,

Vadugapalyam, Thirumanur Via,

Ariyalur Taluk and District 621 715

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The District collector

Ariyalur District 621 704.

2. The Revenue Divisional officer

Ariylaur District 621 704.

3. The Tahsildar

Ariyalur District 621 704

4. Kandasamy

S/o Ramasamy

Middle Street, Vadugapalayam,

Ariyalur Taluk and District 621 715.

..Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition under Directing the Respondents 1 to 3 to consider petitioner representations dated 08.06.2026, 24.08.2026 and 03.09.2026 for removal of encroachment made by the 4th respondents in respect of the property comprising in natham SF. No 258/ 8 (Old Natham S. No 55/2) and

WP No. 45212 of 2026

the assignment land in S. No 256/32, and to dispose of the same within the time as stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner :

Ms.D.E. Anishree Sangavi

For Respondent(s):

Mr.B.Sivakollappan

Additional Government Pleader For 1-3

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) This writ of mandamus has been instituted to consider the representations dated 08.06.2026, 24.08.2026 and 03.09.2026 for removal of encroachment made by the 4th respondents in respect of the property comprising in natham SF. No 258/ 8 (Old Natham S. No 55/2) and the assignment land in S. No 256/32,

2. Learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that the subject land was assigned in favour of the petitioner and Patta was granted. That being so, the petitioner being the assignee has to evict the encroachers if any, by approaching the competent civil court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the civil suit filed by the fourth respondent was dismissed. Thus, the petitioner is at liberty to

WP No. 45212 of 2026 move the civil court for eviction of the unauthorised occupant in the land assigned in favour of the petitioner.

4. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 11-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST To

1. The District collector Ariyalur District 621 704.

2. The Revenue Divisional officer Ariylaur District 621 704

3. The Tahsildar Ariyalur District 621 704

WP No. 45212 of 2026 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN J. KST WP No. 45212 of 2026 11-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead