Madras High Court
WP Crl.(MD)/6119/2026 of Anvardeen Vs The Superintendent of Police on 11 November 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6119 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6119 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011574622026}
Anvardeen
S/o, Nagoor Pechai,
No.5v/3, Sethu Road, Adirampattinam Post, Pattukkottai Taluk, Thanjavur District-614701
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police,
District Police Office,
Thanjavur District, Thanjavur-613001.
2. The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Pattukkottai Sub-Division, Thanjavur District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Adirampattinam Police Station,
Thanjavur District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the petitioner's name from H.S.No.587/2017
maintained by the 3rd respondent by considering representation dated 21.10.2026 in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner(s)
:M/s A. Sheik Nasurdeen
M/s Sasitharan R.
M/s Mohammed Eesa
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 01:17:41 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6119 of 2026
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the petitioner's name from H.S.No.587/2017 maintained by the 3rd respondent by considering representation dated 21.10.2026 in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Court.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice if a direction is issued to the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation within a time frame.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner is involved in some previous cases.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cases pending against the petitioner are falsely foisted against him. He further __________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 01:17:41 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6119 of 2026 submitted that although the petitioner submitted a representation on 21.10.2026 seeking removal of his name from the History Sheet, it remains pending without any progress. Hence, he prayed for suitable directions to the respondents.
6. Considering the limited scope of the prayer, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2026 on its own merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 11-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police District Police Office Thanjavur District, Thanjavur-613001
2. The Assistant Superintendent of Police Pattukkottai Sub-Division Thanjavur District __________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 01:17:41 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6119 of 2026
3. The Inspector of Police Adirampattinam Police Station Thanjavur District
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai __________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 01:17:41 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 6119 of 2026 DR.P.MURUGAN, J. TM WP Crl.(MD) No. 6119 of 2026 11-11-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 01:17:41 pm )