Madras High Court
ARB APPLN/2215/2026 of Cholamandalam investment finance company limited Vs SANTOSH MEHRA and another on 10 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Arb Appln No. 2215 of 2026
M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited., Rep by its authorised Signatory Mrs.Dhanashree Guruprasad No. 2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Parrys Chennai 600 001.
..Applicant
Vs
1. SANTOSH MEHRA
S/o.Shiv Prasad Mehra
55 Ward 66 Badawai Huzur,
M.L Nagar Bhopal Temple,
Bhopal,Madhya Pradesh-462038
2. Shiv Prasad
S/o. Govindi,
55 Ward 66 Badawai Huzur,
M.L Nagar Bhopal Temple,
Bhopal,Madhya Pradesh-462038
..Respondent
Prayer : Judges Summon filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9(2) b & e of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, pass an order of appointment of MR. ADARSH SINGH BAGHEL, AREA
RECEIVABLE MANAGER of the Applicant as a RECEIVER to seize the vehicle more particularly described in the schedule to the Judges Summon wherever stationed in the premises of the respondents or wherever it is found and with whomsoever it is found with powers to break open the premises and grant permission to the receiver to obtain police aid from the concerned police Officer.
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 03:30:18 pm )
Arb Appln No. 2215 of 2026
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J.
NSL
For Applicant:
Mr.A.Damodaran
For Respondent:
No appearance
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the arbitral award proceedings have been initiated and are pending. It is further submitted that the private notice issued to the respondent has been served, but the vehicle is yet to be seized by the party receiver.
2. Even though notice is served, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court and oppose this application.
3. In view thereof, the order dated 28.09.2026 is made absolute.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. 10-11-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSL
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 03:30:18 pm )