Madras High Court
ARB APPLN/2230/2026 of Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited Rep by Mr B ANA Vs Noori Transport Co on 10 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Arb Appln No. 2230 of 2026
M/s.Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited
4th Floor, Phase-II, Spencer Plaza,
769, Anna Salai, Chennai
Tamil Nadu – 600 002.
Rep by its Authority Signatory,
Mr B ANANDA KUMAR
..Applicant
Vs
1. M/s.Noori Transport Co
Rep by its Director,
No.5/11 Sabar Hotel Compound,
Narmada Chokdi N H No. 48,
Bharuch,Gujarat- 392011
2. Arshil Ibrahim Saya
A3, Faiz Park, Bharuch,
Gujarat- 392001
3. Ibrahim Sattarbhai Saya
A/3, Faiz Park, Bharuch,
Gujarat- 392001
..Respondents
Prayer : Judges Summon filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9 (2) b& e of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to pass an order of appointment of SIDHRAJSINH DAYMA, Branch receivable manager of the Applicant as a RECEIVER to seize the vehicle more particularly described in the schedule to the Judges Summon wherever stationed in the premises of the respondents or wherever it is found and with whomsoever it is found with powers to break open the premises and grant permission to the receiver to obtain police aid from the concerned police Officer.
For Applicant:
Mr.A.Damodaran
For Respondent:
No appearance
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 03:30:18 pm )
Arb Appln No. 2230 of 2026
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J.
NSL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the Arbitral Tribunal had already been constituted and that the matter is pending. The private notice, issued to the respondent, is served. The vehicle is yet to be seized by the party receiver.
2. Even though notice is served, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court and oppose this application.
3. In view thereof, the order dated 28.09.2026 is made absolute.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. 10-11-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSL
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 03:30:18 pm )