Madras High Court
ARB APPLN/2258/2026 of MS CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LT Vs SATISH R on 10 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Arb Appln No. 2258 of 2026
M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited., ‘Chola Crest’, C 54 & 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
..Applicant
Vs
Satish. R
..Respondent
Prayer : Judges Summon filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii) (c) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to grant an order appointing as receiver of AJAY MISHRA
currently designated as REGIONAL RECEIVABLE MANAGER of M/S.
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited having his office at chola crest, C54 & 55, super B-4, Thiru-vi-ka industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600032, to visit the respondent’s premises, other areas which is occupied by the Respondent and any other premises of the Respondent along with Local police protection to break open if necessary, and to seize and take custody of the vehicle hypothecated with applicant being Model PRO 2059 XP
HSD WB 3770MM, Chassis No. MC2EGFRC0PMB40205, Engine No.
E446CDPM089051, and bearing Registration No. - UP-38-AT-2731 with all accessories fitted to the asset specifically described in the schedule to the Judge’s Summons and hand them over to the applicant pending final adjudication of the disputes between parties through arbitration For Applicant:
Mr.T.Gowri Shankar
for M/s.San Law Partners LLP
For Respondent:
No appearance
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 03:30:19 pm )
Arb Appln No. 2258 of 2026
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the Arbitral Tribunal had already been constituted and that the matter is pending. The private notice, issued to the respondent, is served. The vehicle is yet to be seized by the party receiver.
2. Even though notice is served, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court and oppose this application.
3. In view thereof, the order dated 29.09.2026 is made absolute.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. 10-11-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSL
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 03:30:19 pm )