Madras High Court
ARB APPLN/2280/2026 of MS CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LT Vs RISHAV MISHRA on 10 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Arb Appln No. 2280 of 2026
M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited., ‘Chola Crest’, C 54 & 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
Rishav Mishra
..Respondent(s)
Prayer : Judges Summon filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii)(c) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying, to grant an order appointing as receiver of ANOOP SAXENA currently designated as AREA RECEIVABLES MANAGER of M/S.Cholamandalam Investment and finance company Limited having his office at chola crest, C54
& 55, super B-4, Thiru-vi-ka industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600032, to visit the respondents premises, other areas which is occupied by the Respondent and any other premises of the Respondent along with Local police protection to break open if necessary, and to seize and take custody of the vehicle hypothecated with applicant being Model INNOVA CRYSTA VX 7-8
SEATER, Chassis No.
MBJAB8EM1044461040823, Engine No.
2GDA746411, and bearing Registration No. - UP-25-DW-0070 with all accessories fitted to the asset specifically described in the schedule to the Judge’s Summons and hand them over to the applicant pending final adjudication of the disputes between parties through arbitration For Petitioner(s):
Mr.T.Gowri Shankar
for M/S.SAN LAW PARTNERS LLP
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 03:30:19 pm )
Arb Appln No. 2280 of 2026
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the Arbitral Tribunal had already been constituted and that the matter is pending. The private notice, issued to the respondent, is served. The vehicle is yet to be seized by the party receiver.
2. Even though notice is served, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court and oppose this application.
3. In view thereof, the order dated 29.09.2026 is made absolute.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. 10-11-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSL
__________
( Uploaded on: 12/11/2026 03:30:19 pm )