Madras High Court

WP/44573/2026 of KATHERINE Vs THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER on 10 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 44573 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE E.MANOHARAN

WP No. 44573 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012587202026}

1. Katherine

2. M.Chandrasekaran

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The Chief Administrative Officer

Care of Principal District Judge

Principal District Court

Villupuram

..Respondent(s)

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records in A.No.307/2026(D.No.5019/2026) and A.No.308/2026 (D.No.5021/2026) dated 29.6.2026 on the file of the respondent and to quash the same as illegal incompetent and devoid of merit and further pass an order directing the respondent to promote the petitioners as Junior Bailiffs (Process Servers) in the existing vacancies.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.Avinashwadhwani

For Respondent(s):

Mr.K.Elumalai,

for Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar,

Standing Counsel.

WP No. 44573 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.Jayachandran J.) Writ petitioners herein, working as Office Assistants in the courts at Tindivanam, Villupuram District, aspire for promotional post of Junior Bailiff/Process Server, without possessing the minimum educational qualification, which is X standard pass. Citing promotions of a few persons without the said educational qualification six years back, the petitioners herein seek parity.

2. Principal District Judge, Villupuram, after perusing the records and judgments of the High Court, holding that promotion given to ineligible persons has to be reverted, has rejected the request of the petitioners.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are aged 58 years and it is too late for them to equip themselves and get the minimum educational qualification, which is X pass, and, therefore, they must be promoted as Junior Bailiffs/Process Servers and that the order of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, rejecting the request of the petitioners is against parity.

4. This Court finds no reasonable cause for the petitioners to agitate against the rejection of their request for promotion. Any person, who aspires for a higher post, must have minimum educational qualification, fixed under service rules. Petitioners herein, admittedly, do not possess X pass, which is the

WP No. 44573 of 2026 minimum educational qualification required for Junior Bailiff/Process Server. Hence, we find no merit in this Writ Petition.

5. Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.M.P.No.50047 of 2026 is closed. (G.J.,J.) (E.M.,J.) 10-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DIXIT To The Chief Administrative Officer Care of Principal District Judge Principal District Court Villupuram

WP No. 44573 of 2026 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. AND E.MANOHARAN, J. DIXIT WP No. 44573 of 2026 10-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead