Central Administrative Tribunal
REENA DHAKREY vs EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) on 12 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
OA No. 4303/2026
This the 12th Day of November, 2026
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J) Hon’ble Mr. Sanjeeva Kumar, Member (A)
Reena Dhakrey, W/o Shri Haresh Kumar, R/0 88-C, LIG Flats, Madhuban Enclave, Rohtak Road, New Delhi - 110063
.…Applicant
(By Advocate : Mr. Saurabh Kumar)
VERSUS
Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Through its Director General, Panch deep Bhawan, CIG Marg, New Delhi-110002. .... RESPONDENTS
[By Advocate :Dr. Divya Swamy)
ARTI
ARTI
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J)
The applicant is aggrieved by an order dated 02.05.2025 whereby the applicant was imposed the punishment of dismissal from service in the year 2025, pursuant to the disciplinary proceedings.
2. The present matter was earlier disposed of by this Tribunal vide order dated 22.12.2025, directing the respondents to consider and decide the applicant's representation dated 13.07.2025 by passing a reasoned and speaking order.
3. The issue for consideration is whether the applicant has approached the competent authority by way of a statutory appeal against the order of dismissal.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had submitted a representation dated 13.07.2025, which is still pending consideration. However, it appears that the applicant was required to avail the statutory remedy of appeal against the order of dismissal, whereas the representation submitted by him was not addressed to the competent appellate authority.
5. In view of the above, we dispose of the present matter by granting one opportunity to the applicant to prefer a statutory appeal against the order of dismissal within a period of four weeks from today.
6. In the event such an appeal is filed within the aforesaid period, the competent appellate authority shall consider and decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months thereafter.
ARTI
ARTI
7. The delay, if any, in filing the appeal shall not come in the way of the appellate authority in considering and deciding the appeal on merits.
8. In view of the above, present OA stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
(Sanjeeva Kumar) (Harvinder Kaur Oberoi) Member (A) Member (J)
/arti/
ARTI 2026.11.12 16:44:26+05'30' ARTI