Central Administrative Tribunal
Ram Paul vs Cpwd on 6 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 20 O.A./1195/2018 (DELHI) [ PAY AND ALLOWANCES ] With M.A./1325/2018 Court No.: 5 No of Adjournment: 36 Order Dated: 06/11/2026 RAM PAUL Vs CPWD
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr Sachin Chauhan For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr Manish Kumar Order of The Tribunal Heard. The principal issue for consideration in the present case is the applicability of Fundamental Rule 17(1) (FR 17(1)). Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that FR 17(1) is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case, particularly in view of the fact that the respondents have granted retrospective seniority to the applicant with effect from 26.03.2013. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the applicant has not actually discharged the duties of the promoted posts during the period from 26.03.2013 till 2017. Accordingly, in view of the provisions of FR 17(1), the applicant is not entitled to draw the higher pay attached to the promoted posts with effect from 26.03.2013. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Order is reserved. Shri Rajveer Singh Verma Member (J) Chhabilendra Roul Member (A) Pinky Yadav ( steno 'c' )