Central Administrative Tribunal
Rajesh Kumar Jaryal vs M/o Social Justice & Empowerment on 6 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH
61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001
Order Sheet
Item no.: 21
O.A./2049/2018 (DELHI)
[ PAY SCALES ]
Court No.: 5
No of Adjournment: 57
Order Dated: 06/11/2026
RAJESH KUMAR JARYAL
Vs
M/O SOCIAL JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr M S Reen
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr Gyanendra Singh Order of The Tribunal Having heard the learned counsel for both parties, this Tribunal is of the considered view that, for proper adjudication of the present case, the following clarifications are required:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether the Commissionerate of Disabilities has notified/adopted the revised pay structure in respect of the post of Private Secretary, as contemplated under Section II of Part B of the First Schedule to the Ministry of Finance Notification dated 29.08.2008, granting the corresponding Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/- in Pay Band-2 (Rs. 9,300–34,800/-).
2. Even in the absence of any specific notification granting Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/- to the Private Secretaries of the Commissionerate of Disabilities, and notwithstanding the non- extension of the corresponding upgraded pay scale of Rs. 7,500–12,000/-, whether there existed historical parity between the Private Secretaries of the Commissionerate of Disabilities and the Private Secretaries of the Central Secretariat Services (CSS/CSSS), so as to attract the benefit contemplated under the aforesaid notification dated 29.08.2008. The aforesaid clarifications shall be furnished by the respective parties as follows:
(i) The first clarification shall be furnished by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
(ii) The second clarification shall be furnished by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants. List the matter as "part-heard" on 01.12.2026. Shri Rajveer Singh Verma Member (J) Chhabilendra Roul Member (A) Pinky Yadav ( steno 'c' )