Central Administrative Tribunal
UMESH KUMAR SINHA vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 12 November 2026
HON’
By Ad
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
By Ad
PER :
2.
CENTRAL ADMINISTR
PATNA BENCH
OA No. 050/00
CORAM
’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA
HON’LE MR. KUMAR RAJESH
Umesh Kumar sinha S/o late Re
CTI Patna Jn E.C. Raly, Danapu
Kadhidargha, P.s. Didarganj Pat
dvocate(s) :- Shri S.K. Tiwari
VERSU
Union of India through the G
Railway, Hajipur, District- Vais
The Divisional Railway Man
Danapur-801503.
The Divisional Commercial M
Danapur-801503.
The Assistant Personnel Of
Danapur-801503.
The Station Manager, E.C. Ralw
dvocate(s) :- Shri M.D. Dwived
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA
Shri S.K. Tiwari, learned coun Shri M.D. Dwivedi, ld. ASC OA has appeared for the respo The case is at notice stage hea OA 050/00759/2026
RATIVE TRIBUNAL H, PATNA
M KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER (J) CHANDRA, MEMBER (A) Order dated : 12.11.2026. ejeshwar Prasad working as Dy. ur, Resident of Gulmahia Bagh, tna City District- Patna-800008.
……..Applicant S. General Manager, East Central hali, (Bihar)-844101. nager, East Central Railway, Manager, East Central Railway, fficer, East Central Railway, way, Patna-800001. ……..Respondents
i. ld. ASC (ORAL) : nsel for applicant is present. on receipt of advance copy of ondents. aring. . . , t l , , , s
f Digitally signed by MANORANJ AN KUMAR SINHA MANOR ANJAN KUMAR SINHA
3. issuan the Pr that is way rule/la
4. prayer
5. applic directe Annex a perio by w comm
6. opinio
(Kuma Me
Mks
Heard learned counsel for ap nce of notice. After arguing f rinciple of Natural justice wil s lying pending with the respon of passing a reasoned an aw/procedures within stipulate Learned counsel for respond r of counsel for applicant. In view of the innocuous pra cant, respondent authority/co ed to decide the representa xure A/4 with this O.A. as per od of 45 days from the date of way of passing a reasoned municate the same to the applic Needless to say that this Tri on on the merit of the case. ar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice ember (A) OA 050/00759/2026
applicant who has prayed for for some time he averred that ll be met if the representation ndent authorities is decided by nd speaking order as per ed period of time. dents has not objected to the ayer made by the counsel for ompetent authority is being ation that has been kept at r rules/laws/procedures within f receipt of copy of this order, d and speaking order and ant. ibunal has not expressed any e Narendra Kumar Johari) Member(J) r t n y r e r g t n , d y Digitally signed by MANORANJ AN KUMAR SINHA MANOR ANJAN KUMAR SINHA