Central Administrative Tribunal
MIRTUNJAY SINGH vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 12 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH
PATNA
C.P. No. 050/00081/2026
(IN O.A. 050/00303/2026)
Dated :- 12.11.2026
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kr. Johari, Judicial Member Hon’ble Mr. Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member
In the matter of :
Mirtunjay Singh,
Son of Late Kashi Nath Singh, Office Superintendent, Office of the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Sonpur, Resident of Sonpur Adam, Post- Sonpur, District- Saran- 841101 (Bihar).
………….Petitioner
VS.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sri Dimpy Garg, The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, PO- Digghi Kalan, PS- Hajipur (Sadar), District- Vaishali, Pin- 844101.
2. Sri S. C. Srivastava, The Principal Chief Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Hajipur, PO- Digghi Kalan, PS- Hajipur (Sadar), District- Vaishali, Pin- 844101.
3. Sri Ashutosh Jha, The Deputy Chief Vigilance Officer (S), East Central Railway, Hajipur, PO- Digghi Kalan, PS- Hajipur (Sadar), District- Vaishali, Pin- 844101.
4. Sri Amit Sharan, The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Sonpur, District- Saran- 841101 (Bihar).
5. Sri Dilip Paswan, The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Sonpur, District- Saran- 841101 (Bihar).
........ Respondents
Phone=
Location:
Sonali Lal
For The Applicant(s): Mr. M. P. Dixit
For The Respondent(s): Mr. T. N. Thakur
O R D E R (ORAL) Per : Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Member (A)
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15140 of 2026, preferred by the respondents before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna, has already been disposed of vide order dated 27.10.2026, having been rendered infructuous in view of the compliance made by the respondents with the order passed by this Tribunal.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents also submits that, as stated in paragraph 7 of the reply to the show cause notice, a revised office order dated 12.10.2026 has already been issued in compliance with the order dated 25.08.2026 passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 303/2026. Accordingly, it is contended that the directions issued by this Tribunal have been duly complied with and nothing further survives for consideration in the present Contempt Petition.
Phone=
Location:
Sonali Lal
4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for both parties and upon perusal of the materials placed on record, particularly the revised office order dated 12.10.2026, this Tribunal is satisfied that the order dated 25.08.2026 passed in OA No. 303/2026 has been duly complied with by the respondents. Consequently, no further cause survives for proceeding with the present Contempt Petition.
5. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands dropped.
6. Notices issued to the respondents, stand discharged.
Sd/-
Sd/- (Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kr. Johari) Administrative Member
Judicial Member
sl
Phone=
Location:
Sonali Lal