Central Administrative Tribunal
Shishupal Kumar vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 12 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH
PATNA
O.A. No. 050/00017/2026
M.A. No. 050/00209/2026
Dated :- 12.11.2026
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kr. Johari, Judicial Member Hon’ble Mr. Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member
In the matter of :
Shishupal Kumar,
Aged about 46 years, Son of Late Braj Mohan Singh, resident of village- Mustafapur, PO- Khagaul, District- Patna (Bihar), Presently posted at Danapur on the post of LPS-II.
…………. Applicant
VS.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Union of India through General Manager, East Central Railways, Hajipur- 844101.
2. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railways, Danapur- 801105.
3. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Danapur- 801105.
4. The Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railways, Danapur, District- Patna- 801105.
........ Respondents
For The Applicant(s): Md. Firaque Ali, Counsel
For The Respondent(s): Mrs. P. R. Lakshmi, ASC
Phone=
Location:
Sonali Lal
O R D E R (ORAL) Per : Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.
2. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief: “(a) To quash the part of the order as contained in order dated 07.04.2025 whereby the applicant has been posted at Tilaiya till the representation made to post the applicant at Danapur are not disposed of by the Respondents.
(b) Direct the respondents to produce all the records of the case along with their reply for perusal by this Hon’ble Tribunal.
(c) Allow the cost of this application to the applicant.
(d) Pass such other order or reliefs as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in the favour of the applicant and against the respondent.”
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the principal substantive relief sought in paragraph 8(a) of the OA, namely, quashing of the order dated 07.04.2025 to the extent that the applicant was posted at Tilaiya, pending disposal of his representation seeking posting at Danapur, has already been granted. He submits that the applicant has now been posted at Danapur and, therefore, the grievance forming the basis of the present OA no longer survives.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents also acknowledges that the aforesaid relief has already been granted to the applicant and, accordingly, submits that the present matter has been rendered infructuous.
Phone=
Location:
Sonali Lal
5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for both parties and upon perusal of the reliefs claimed in the OA, this Tribunal finds that the reliefs sought in paragraph 8(b),
(c) and (d) are only ornamental and consequential in nature and arise out of the principal relief claimed in paragraph 8(a). Since the principal grievance of the applicant stands redressed by his subsequent posting at Danapur, no further adjudication on the remaining consequential reliefs is warranted.
6. In view of the above, the OA stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
7. Pending MA(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Sd/- (Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kr. Johari) Administrative Member
Judicial Member
sl
Phone=
Location:
Sonali Lal