Central Administrative Tribunal
LALLAN PAUL vs SRI VINAY KUMAR TRIPATHI on 11 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 25 C.P./25/2021 (PATNA) [ CONTEMPT ] In O.A./255/2016 REDUCTION IN PAY Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 36 Order Dated: 11/11/2026 LALLAN PAUL Vs SRI VINAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. M.P. Dixit For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. T.N. Thakur, Sr. CGSC Order of The Tribunal Heard counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel for the respondents. Mr. Subhash Chandra, Deputy Secretary, has appeared pursuant to the notice issued for personal appearance before this Tribunal to assist the Bench. Counsel for the respondents, along with the accompanying officials, have fairly submitted that they are in the process of complying with the order passed by this Tribunal, which can easily be divided into the following three parts:
(a) A revised PPO is to be issued by revising the earlier PPO dated 27.04.2015.
(b) The applicant is to be extended the benefits in terms of the order passed in the present O.A., in accordance with the applicable rules, including the benefits of ad hoc promotions/ACP/MACP, in the light of the decision of this Tribunal in O.A. No. 436/2013.
(c) The amount already recovered is to be refunded immediately and, in any case, not later than three months from the date of receipt of the order.
So far as the third part is concerned, both parties have admitted that the same was complied with on 08.11.2024 itself. As regards the first two parts, counsel for the respondents as well as the respondent official have assured this Tribunal that the process of compliance is underway and that the same shall be completed within a period of one month. Accordingly, the matter is fixed for further consideration and for filing of a supplementary compliance affidavit, specifically detailing and delineating all the steps taken by the respondents towards compliance with the order passed by this Tribunal. List the case on 21.12.2026. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA Member (A) Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Durgesh Uttam ( court master )