Central Administrative Tribunal
Sukhdeo vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 10 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 7 O.A./116/2026 (PATNA) [ REVISION OF PENSION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 10 Order Dated: 10/11/2026 SUKHDEO Vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri Barj Kishore Sharma, appearing through VC mode.
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Bhuneshwar Pandey, ld. ASC., Shri Mrityunjay Kumar, l/c for R- 5 to 7. Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsels for both the parties. Looking at record, we find that counsel for respondents no 1 to 4 has filed short reply and he has averred that he does not intend to file any further reply as this suffices. Counsel for the respondents no. 5 to 7 has already filed W.S. Counsel for the applicant seeks one more opportunity of four weeks to file rejoinder. Request acceded to. Fix the matter on 17.12.2026 for filng rejoinder. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA Member (A) Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Binay Prasad ( ps )