Central Administrative Tribunal
Hajarabi P U vs UNION TERRITORY on 12 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 43 O.A./570/2026 (LAKSHADWEEP) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 12/11/2026 HAJARABI P U Vs UNION TERRITORY For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. T.C. Govindaswamy For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Prenjith Kumar K.S. Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal
Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. Admit. Sri. Prenjith Kumar K.S, learned Standing Counsel for the Lakshadweep Administration submits that the representation given by the applicant has been considered after giving an opportunity of personal hearing. According to him, it is a rotational transfer involving 423 employees. It is also submitted that the applicant is working in Kavaratti for the last 21 years. Call on 13.11.2026 (tomorrow).
BRAJ MOHAN AGRAWAL MEMBER (A) JUSTICE K HARIPAL MEMBER (J) Reshmi R ( )
Case No O.A./570/2026 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 43 Generated by Reshmi CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 12/11/2026
2026.11.12 16:06:05+05'30' A X Sherin