Central Administrative Tribunal

Pookoya vs UT OF LAKSHADWEEP on 12 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 41 O.A./229/2026 (LAKSHADWEEP) [ CASUAL LABOUR ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 6 Order Dated: 12/11/2026 POOKOYA Vs UT OF LAKSHADWEEP For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. V.B. Hari Narayanan For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Prenjith Kumar K.S. Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal

Today when taken up for final hearing, learned Standing Counsel has submitted that respondents want to file additional reply statement along with additional documents and will be filed within 10 days. Adjourned to 30.11.2026 in the hearing list. BRAJ MOHAN AGRAWAL MEMBER (A) JUSTICE K HARIPAL MEMBER (J) Reshmi R ( )

Case No O.A./229/2026 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 41 Generated by Reshmi CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 12/11/2026

2026.11.12 16:59:43+ 05'30' A X Sherin

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead