Central Administrative Tribunal
Sukh Deo Sharma vs DEFENCE PRODUCTION on 26 October 2026
C P No. 152/2025
Central Administrative Tribunal
Mumbai Bench,
Camp at Nagpur
Contempt Petition No. 152/2025.
Date of Decision: 26th October, 2026
CORAM:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.G. Sewlikar, Member (J)
Hon'ble Mr.Sangam Narain Srivastava,Member (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sukh Deo Sharma, aged 69 years, Retired as Junior Works Manager, O. F. Ambajhari, Nagpur 440023, R/O, Plot No. 22, Venanagar, Dattawadi, Nagpur 440023. M. No. 7218283632. Email: sukhdeosharma317@gmail.com.
2. Brahm N. Tiwari, aged 69 years, Retired as Junior Works Manager, O.F Ambajhari, Nagpur, 440023, R/O Plot No. 1, Adiwasi Layout, Suraksha Nagar, Nagpur 440023.
3. Ajay D Vyavhare, aged about 62 years, Retired as Junior Works Manager, O.F. Ambajhari, Nagpur 440023, R/o Plot No. 210, Guruprasadnagar, Gajanan Society, Duttawadi, Nagpur 440023.
… Applicant
(By Advocate Shri B Lahiri) Versus
1. Shri Ajay Kumar Yerpude, E.D., Ordnance Factory Ambajhari, Nagpur 440021.
2. Shri Surendra Dhapodkar, Sr. Dy. Director General, DoO (C&S), Directorate Field Unit, Ambajhari, First Floor, Admin Block, O.F., Ambhajhari, Nagpur 440021.
…. Respondents
(By Advocate Shri Bhaskar D Pandit) Digitally signed by C SADISH KUMAR Date: 2026.11.12 09:55:13 +05'30' C SADISH KUMAR
C P No. 152/2025
Order (oral)
Per: Justice M.G. Sewlikar, Member (J)
We have heard ld. Counsel for the applicant and ld. Counsel for the respondents.
2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents, Shri Pandit submits that respondents have passed order in terms of direction of this Tribunal although there is delay of one year. He submits that respondents have given reasons for delay in compliance and have also tendered unconditional apology.
3. Since the respondents/contemnors have complied the order and have tendered unconditional apology, we accept the apology and close the contempt proceeding.
4. Contempt Petition is closed.
Notices stand discharged. No costs.
(Sangam Narain Srivastava)
(Justice M.G. Sewlikar) Member (A)
Member (J)
(sadish) Digitally signed by C SADISH KUMAR Date: 2026.11.12 09:55:13 +05'30' C SADISH KUMAR