Central Administrative Tribunal
ROHIT MATHUR vs NORTHERN RAILWAY on 6 November 2026
CAT, Lucknow Bench OA No. 332/00549/2026 Rohit Mathur Vs U.O.I. & Ors.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH
Original Application No. 332/00549/2026
Dated, this 6th day of November, 2026
HON’BLE MR. PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
Rohit Mathur, aged about 54 years, son of Late Sri Jagdish Chandra Mathur, R/o - II-16/C, Railway Colony, Ayodhya.
(Presently Posted - Chief Inspector of Ticket (Conductor), Ayodhya).
...Applicant
By Advocate: Shri Praveen Kumar
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India, through the General Manager, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi.
2. The Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Hazratganj, Lucknow.
3. The Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, Northern Railway, Hazratganj, Lucknow.
4. The Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager, Northern Railway, Hazratganj, Lucknow. ...Respondents
By Advocate: Smt. Prayagmati Gupta
O R D E R (ORAL) PER HON’BLE MR. PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER (A) In this case relating to transfer, the applicant has sought the following reliefs: i. To quash the impugned transfer order dated 17.07.2026 (contained as Annexure No. A-1 to this OA) to the extent it relates to the applicant and all other consequential order if any may also be quashed, with all consequential benefits. ii. To quash the impugned rejection order dated 28.08.2026 (contained as Annexure No. A-2 to this OA), with all consequential benefits. iii. To allow the applicant to continue at present place of posting and pay him salary accordingly. iv. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case, may also be passed. v. Cost of the present case.
CAT, Lucknow Bench OA No. 332/00549/2026 Rohit Mathur Vs U.O.I. & Ors.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that ends of justice would be served if applicant is permitted to file fresh representation and the competent authority is directed to decide the same by way of reasoned and speaking order considering applicant’s illness within a reasonable period of time.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents opposes the aforesaid prayer; however, submits that, if so directed, at least two months’ time may be given for disposal of the said representation. 5.1 Keeping in view the innocuous prayer made by the applicant, this O.A. is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case, granting liberty to the applicant to submit a fresh representation mentioning necessary details to the respondents within two weeks of receipt of certified copy of this order and the respondents/competent authority are directed to decide the applicant’s representation considering his illness by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and communicate it to the applicant within a period of two months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5.2 Associated MAs also stand disposed of. 5.3 Parties shall bear their own costs.
(Pankaj Kumar)
Member (A)
Warij
Warij Yadav Digitally signed by Warij Yadav