Daily order sheet, C2, 05 Nov 2026 on 5 November 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. counsel for the respondents are physically present.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that this O.A. is not maintainable before this Court. He, therefore, seeks some time to file detailed objection against maintainability of the original application.

4. As prayed, four weeks time is allowed for filing of detailed objection on maintainability of this O.A..

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 7)

DY. No. 3318 of 2026

Ex Nk Sancha Bahadur Limbu

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

3. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. On perusal of record, it transpires that certain defects raised by the Registry have not been removed by the applicant, therefore, this case is listed as Dy. Number.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks and allowed two weeks time to rectify the defects raised by the Registry.

6. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 8)

M.A. No. 1317 of 2026 Inre M.A. No. 687 of 2026 Inre Ex. A. No. 424 of 2025 Inre O.A. No. 220 of 2016

Sub Radhey Shyam( Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present. M.A. No. 1317 of 2026

2. This application has been filed by the applicant for early hearing of the Recall Application which was listed on 10.09.2026 but the Bench was not available on that day and the case was listed for hearing on 04.03.2027. Applicant has prayed to pre-pone the Recall Application.

3. Heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as mentioned in the early hearing application and also keeping in mind that the said case pertains to non-implementation of the Court Order passed in O.A. No. 220 of 2016, the early hearing application is allowed and now the case be listed for hearing of Recall Application on 17.12.2026.

5. M.A No. 1317 of 2026 stands disposed of.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 1)

EX-A. No. 253 of 2024 Inre O.A. No. 347 of 2022

Ex ACP Nk Dharmendra Kumar Upadhyay & Others Applicants By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Ashok Singh and

Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicants and Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present.

2. Heard the Ld. counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. This case was decided on 20.09.2022. This Execution Application is pending for more than two years. On earlier occasion i.e. on 22.05.2026, Ld. Counsel for the respondents apprised the Court that a Writ Petition No. 559 of 2026 has been filed by the Union of India before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench assailing the order of this Tribunal dated 20.09.2022 but no stay order has yet to be passed.

5. In such circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed by them before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant and ten others to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against them, they would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

6. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 2)

EX-A. No. 402 of 2025 Inre O.A. No. 64 of 2024

Ex Hav Suresh Pal Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that Corrigendum PPO dated 29.08.2026 has been issued in pursuance of the Tribunal order dated 28.05.2025.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that payment has not yet been paid as per Tribunal order dated 28.05.2025.

4. In this circumstances, respondents are hereby directed to file compliance affidavit, copy duly served upon the applicant, before the next date fixed.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 3)

EX-A No.425 of 2025 Inre O.A. No. 149 of 2024

Hav (AA)Tej Bhan (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none appears on behalf of the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is physically present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed so far.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that GSL is still awaited from the Department.

4. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 4)

EX-A. No.426 of 2025 Inre O.A. No. 142 of 2024

Hav (AA)Teg Singh (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none appears on behalf of the applicant. Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Department has decided to prefer Writ Petition before the High Court against order of this Tribunal, shortly.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed so far.

4. Learned Counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed four weeks further time to file compliance affidavit.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.5)

O.A. No. 948/2024

Ex Hony Sub Maj Riyasat

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Hemlata , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Hemlata, Ld. Counsel for the applicant present before the court and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Counter Affidavit has already been filed by the ld. Counsel for respondents, which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant has also filed Rejoinder Reply, which is also taken on record.

4. On the next date of listing, the case shall be heard on maintainability of the O.A.

5. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.6)

O.A. No. 41/2025 with MA 43/2025

Ex Sgt Baikunth Nath Mishra

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Abhyuday Mishra and Shri Amitabh Kumar Rai , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Abhyuday Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. None present for the respondents.

2. Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate is present before the court and filed vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant, which is taken on record. No objection of previous counsel Sri Abhyday Mishra has been provided to Sri Rahul Pal by the applicant. Registry is directed to show the name of Sri Rahul Pal as counsel for applicant in future cause list.

3. It is also pointed out that on 1.4.2026, it was ordered by this bench that another counsel for applicant Sri Amitabh Kumar Rai has been elevated as High Court Judge of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad but despite that his name has been shown in the today’s cause list. Registry is directed not to show the name of Sri Abhyuday Mishra and Sri Amitabh Kumar Rai as counsel for applicant in future cause list.

4. Ld. Counsel for applicant seeks time to file reply to the objection filed by ld. Counsel for respondents against maintainability of the O.A.

5. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.7)

O.A. No. 107/2025 With MA 636/2026 in re MA 532/2025 along with OA 330/2023 (decided)

Munni Devi w/o late Ex Sub Maj/Hony (Lt) Akbar Singh Yadav Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav Shri Saurabh Yadav , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra Shri Mohd. Zafar Khan Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey Sri Girish Tiwari and Vishnu Kant, Advocates Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. Mohd Zafar Khan, respondent No. 5 and 6 is present before the court. Sri Vijay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.7 is also present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents No.7 have already filed objection on maintainability of O.A., which is taken on record,

3. On the next date of listing, the applicant counsel may file reply to the objection filed by ld. Counsel for respondent No. 7 and present physically to address the court regarding maintainability of the O.A.

4. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.8)

O.A. No. 375/2025

Smt. Munni Devi w/o late Sub Maj Akbar Singh (through Pairokar) Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey Shri Girish Tiwari Shri Vishnu Kant Awasthi Shri Amit Kumar Bajpai , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu Mohd. Zafar Khan, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. Mohd. Zafar Khan, ld. Counsel for respondent No. 4 and 5 is present before the court.

2. Counter Affidavit has already been filed by respondent No.4 and 5 which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for respondents No.1,2 and 3 (Union of India) seeks time to file counter affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed

4. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.9)

O.A. No. 465/2025

Smt. Tara gurung d/o late Sub Sau Bahadur Gurung Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri V.P. Pandey Shri R.K. Singh , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant has already filed Rejoinder Reply which is taken on record. Now pleadings in this case are complete.

3. List on 14.5.2027 for final physical hearing.

Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.10)

O.A. No. 617/2025

Wg Cdr Chandra Shekhar Azad Gupta

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg Cdr SN Dwivedi (Retd.) , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri R.C. Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Wg Cdr SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant seeks time to file Rejoinder Reply. Time as prayed is granted.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.11)

O.A. No. 81/2026

Rainu Faujdar w/o Late Abhishek Kumar LOG I SC Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Anand Dubey Shri Anil Kumar Singh , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Smt. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, None present for the applicant. Smt. Anju Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Today, this case was listed for filing reply to the objection filed by the respondents on maintainability of the O.A. but applicant counsel is not present today. On the previous date also i.e. on 21.8.2026, no one was present on behalf of the applicant, which clearly indicates that applicant has lost interest to pursue his case.

3. Accordingly, O.A. is dismissed in default and for want of prosecution.

4. No order as to costs.

Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.12)

O.A. No. 248/2026 JWO Bhola Nath Singh (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra

Ms. Upasana Mishra, Pradeep Kr. Mishra

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Yogesh Kr. Mishra

Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant before the court and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks some time to file counter affidavit. Last opportunity is granted to the ld counsel for respondents to file counter affidavit. Copy of counter affidavit may also be handed over to the ld. Counsel for applicant.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.13)

O.A. No. 753/2026 with MA 904/2026

Deuka Ranabhat w/o Nk Chandrabir Chhetri @ Chandra Bahadur Ranabhat

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Balaur , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, None present for the applicant Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Today, this case is listed for filing objection on delay condonation application but objection has not been filed. Ld. Counsel for respondents seeks some more time to file objection. Time as prayed is granted. If he failed to file objection by the next date, opportunity for filing objection will be closed.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.14)

O.A. No. 560/2026 with MA 1178/2026

Mrs. Banti Kundu w/o Nb Sub (Nur Tech) Sabyasachi Kundu Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma

Shri RahulPal and Sunidhi Tyagi , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant before the court. None present for the respondents

2. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 15)

O.A. No. 184/2021 with CA No. 01/2026 with M.A. No. 583/2026 and M.A. No. 1101/2025

Cpl Manish Kumar Tiwari

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Abhishek Tiwari and Shri SK Warish Ali, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. His name shall be shown in the cause list when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No 1-5 and Shri Ashamed Ali Ansari, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No 6 are present.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Regarding stoppage of maintenance allowance, this Tribunal has passed order dated 11.12.2025.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that this Tribunal had passed order dated 11.12.2025 for stoppage of recovery from pay and allowances of the applicant, but despite passing clear orders, the respondents are still recovering maintenance allowance @ Rs 17,200/- p.m. from the pay and allowances of the applicant. Being aggrieved he has moved contempt application with a prayer that the Chief of the Air Staff has defied the order of this Tribunal dated 11.12.2025. Ld. Counsel for the applicant further submits that he wants to move amendment application for correction the name of Chief of the Air Staff as previous incumbent, who passed the order dated 24.05.2026 granting maintenance allowance, has since retired.

6. It is pertinent to mention that order dated 11.12.2025 was passed for stoppage of further maintenance allowance with clear instructions that no recovery shall be made from the pay and allowances of the applicant. To this, submission of Ld. Counsel for the respondent No 1-5 is that maintenance allowance has been granted to respondent No. 6 based on second Air Force Order w.e.f. Nov 2025 on receipt of representation dated 28.08.2025 from respondent No 6.

7. In view of the above, the respondents are directed to stop further recovery from pay and allowances of the applicant with immediate effect, failing which coercive action shall be taken against the erring officer.

8. Meanwhile, Ld. Counsel for the applicant may file amendment application.

9. Copy of this order be supplied to Ld. Counsel for the respondents for compliance.

10. List on 19.02.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 16)

O.A. No. 344/2021 with M.A. No. 570/2026

Ex JWO Anil Kumar Ojha

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Pandey, Ms Nisha Pandey and Shri Shiv Kant Pandey, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shiv Kant Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode

2. Matter requires physical hearing, but both the counsels are present through virtual mode.

3. List on 29.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 17)

O.A. No. 789/2024

Ex Hav (ACP Nb Sub) Rajesh Kumar Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not well prepared, therefore, the case is passed over for the day.

4. List on 22.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 18)

O.A. No. 846/2024

Ex Hav Surender Kumar

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav and Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra and Shri Saket Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Pushpendra Mishra and Shri Saket Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present in Court.

2. Matter requires physical hearing, but Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not physically present.

3. List on 30.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 19)

T.A. No. 80/2016

Anoop Kumar

Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Due to paucity of time, this case could not be heard.

3. List on 13.05.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 20)

T.A. No. 39/2023

Ex Sgt Anurag Shukla

Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner : Shri Tatsat Shukla, Shri Dhiraj Kumar and Shri Rahul Pal, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh and Shri Sanjeev Singh, Advocates Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present in Court and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh and Shri Sanjeev Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Due to paucity of time, this case could not be heard.

3. List on 13.05.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore